Mental Health Bill 2024: Committee Stage (Resumed)
Dail Éireann — 2025-06-18
============================================================

Sorca Clarke (SF), Longford-Westmeath

I want to make a brief comment on section 92 as a whole. My amendment also was ruled out of order because of a potential charge on the State. I find that any amendment which explicitly refers to a statutory right to advocacy could be ruled out of order will be a very tough pill to swallow for a lot of the advocates, patients and service users.
With respect to Deputy Quaide, amendment No. 204 lays out very clearly what could be a very effective system for those who want and ask for a statutory right to advocacy. I could not let the section pass without saying that this ruling sticks in my craw. My amendment would not have resulted in a cost to the State; rather, it would have involved a transfer of funds into a different part of the system. The amendment did not propose an additional service. Should an amendment to be ruled out of order because of a potential charge, I would like information to be provided as to where that might be and how much it might cost for budgeting reasons, if not any other.

---

Source: Houses of the Oireachtas. Licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The Official Report is revised after first publication; the fetch timestamp below identifies the version quoted.

Record URI: https://data.oireachtas.ie/akn/ie/debateRecord/dail/2025-06-18/debate/main
Retrieved: 2026-08-14T04:53:56+00:00
Sitting date: 2025-06-18