European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters: Motion Seanad Éireann — 2025-12-16 ============================================================ Nicole Ryan (SF), Administrative Panel Sinn Féin supports mutual legal assistance. Crime does not respect borders. Effective co-operation between states is essential in tackling organised crime, trafficking, financial crime and, of course, terrorism. However, support for co-operation does not mean automatic agreement to every justice-related EU measure placed before us under Protocol 21 nor does it mean that Ireland should sign up without proper scrutiny where issues of sovereignty, democratic oversight and civil liberties are clearly engaged. Protocol 21 exists for a reason. It was a democratic assurance to the Irish people that justice and home affairs would remain subject to national choice. That opt-out was fundamental and not decorative, yet we increasingly see a default Government position of opting in under Article 3, often under tight timelines and with limited scrutiny. The effect of this is that Ireland becomes bound by qualified majority vote and loses its veto, even if the final outcome does not reflect our best interests. That is the issue at its core. Under Article 3, we opt in early and we are bound, regardless of the final text. Under Article 4, Ireland retains the right to opt in after adoption, once the detail is clear, the safeguards are visible and the real-world implications are understood. Our position has always been the same. Unless there is a compelling reason to do otherwise, Article 4 should be the default. Ireland is already part of the 1959 convention and its first and second edition protocols, which expanded co-operation in sensible and appropriate ways. The third additional protocol, however, goes further, and that is where the legitimate concerns arise. Articles 1 and 2, dealing with electronic communication and videoconferencing, are largely practical and reflect modern realities, but Article 3, which facilitates co-operation in the use of technical recording devices, including GPS tracking and audio surveillance, raises serious red flags. It allows for requests even after the fact, for example, where a device has crossed a border. This represents a qualitative shift. Mutual legal assistance has traditionally meant sharing evidence, not facilitating surveillance activities that may already have taken place within another state’s territory. This has serious implications for sovereignty, oversight and accountability. Who authorises this activity? What safeguards apply? What remedies exist if Irish citizens’ rights are breached? How do we ensure compatibility with our own constitutional protections? These questions are not answered by this motion. Justice is not just an abstract EU competence. It goes to the heart of the relationship between the state and the individual. Sinn Féin does not support the steady drift towards an EU justice superstructure that erodes national democratic control. That does not make us anti-European; it makes us pro-democracy. There is no compelling urgency that justifies surrendering leverage at this stage. Ireland can co-operate fully while choosing to opt in later under Article 4. This motion, therefore, presents us with a choice. Do we continue with the drip-drip approach of incremental opt-ins or do we pause, scrutinise and decide deliberately? For us, sovereignty over justice matters must remain with the people of Ireland and their elected representatives. For that reason, we will support mutual legal assistance in principle but we cannot support an Article 3 opt-in to this protocol in its current form. We urge the Government to reconsider and pursue the Article 4 opt-in, allowing for proper scrutiny, clearer safeguards and genuine democratic oversight. --- Source: Houses of the Oireachtas. Licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The Official Report is revised after first publication; the fetch timestamp below identifies the version quoted. Record URI: https://data.oireachtas.ie/akn/ie/debateRecord/seanad/2025-12-16/debate/main Retrieved: 2026-08-14T04:54:28+00:00 Sitting date: 2025-12-16