Garda Síochána (Powers) Bill 2026: Committee Stage (Resumed)
Seanad Éireann — 2026-05-26
============================================================

Lynn Ruane (IND), University of Dublin

I move amendment No. 6:
In page 9, to delete line 5.
Amendments Nos. 6, 7, 9, 12, and 13 relate to stop-and-search powers. Obviously, many of the exceptions referenced are hugely important to relevant articles, but not necessarily in terms of recodifying some very concerning stop-and-search powers within this legislation. This suite of amendments seeks to narrow the definition of what constitutes a relevant article under this Bill, which we believe is far too wide as drafted. Given how invasive, degrading and humiliating an experience it can be to be stopped and searched by gardaí, it is absolutely essential that there are sufficient guardrails and robust safeguards in place to prevent abuse of these powers. Under the proposed legislation, An Garda Síochána will be able to stop and search individuals where they have reasonable grounds to suspect that a person is in possession of a relevant article. This will become the foundational basis for An Garda Síochána to exercise stop-and-search powers and the circumstances under which a significant number of interactions between the public and the gardaí will take place.
At the moment, the vast majority of stop-and-searches by gardaí are undertaken under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1977. Under this Act, gardaí are empowered to stop and search someone in a public place or in a vehicle if they reasonably suspect that a person is in possession of a prohibited substance as an offence under section 3 of the Act. It has been demonstrated in Ireland that the courts are usually quite deferential to the legal thresholds for police searches set out by the Oireachtas, meaning that the gardaí currently have wide discretion to exercise their stop-and-search powers. Those who observe stop-and-searches rightly assume that the person subject to a stop-and-search has done something wrong, but research demonstrates that in the overwhelming majority of instances of stop-and-search, no criminal wrongdoing is detected. Subsequently, those subject to stop-and-search develop a highly negative view of the interaction, which feeds into the negative perceptions of policing in the community, undermining police and community relations.
Contact with the criminal justice system is shaped partially by behaviour, but also by visibility and enforcement. In particular, the experience of being stopped and searched by gardaí is effectively normalised. This is because people are more likely to be stopped indiscriminately by the gardaí if they are from a community that is overpoliced or where police-community relations are under strain than if they are from a far more affluent community where there is a greater sense of trust between the community and the police. It is not the case that working-class communities or minority communities are inherently more violent or more prone to criminal activity, yet they bear the brunt of the State's policing responses.
We should facilitate a discussion at another stage on the social determinants of crime, and the social, economic and environmental factors, which we know to be the most significant drivers of criminality, but we must also recognise the stigma that comes from being part of an under-served or under-represented community, and how this shapes interaction between the gardaí and the community. Research demonstrates that under-served and under-represented communities recognise frequent, routine contact with gardaí as part of everyday life in their areas, but it is not the case that the presence of An Garda Síochána in these communities has made them any safer, or even provided a feeling of safety for the community. Rather, it serves to undermine relations between the community and police, and erodes trust which effective policing relies on.
According to a recent report published by the Irish Penal Reform Trust, IPRT, called From Punishment to Prevention, place-based factors such as income inequality, labour market conditions, housing insecurity, social exclusion and weak community infrastructure contribute to higher levels of crime, victimisation and greater justice system contact, with more frequent and more intrusive policing. For many of the IPRT's research participants, being known in their local community meant being stopped repeatedly by gardaí while going about ordinary activities, even when no offence had been committed.

---

Source: Houses of the Oireachtas. Licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The Official Report is revised after first publication; the fetch timestamp below identifies the version quoted.

Record URI: https://data.oireachtas.ie/akn/ie/debateRecord/seanad/2026-05-26/debate/main
Retrieved: 2026-08-14T04:54:59+00:00
Sitting date: 2026-05-26