Waste Management (Single Household Waste Collection Service) Bill 2026: Second Stage [Private Members]
Dail Éireann — 2026-07-16
============================================================

Marie Sherlock (LAB), Dublin Central

I move: “That the Bill be now read a Second Time.”
We in the Labour Party passionately believe that we need to have a serious overhaul of how waste is collected and regulated across every county in this country. In that context, I am very proud to see our Labour Party Bill proceed to Second Stage in the Dáil today. The Bill is the Waste Management (Single Household Waste Collection Service) Bill 2026. This is an issue that I have been working on for a number of years, both in my time working for SIPTU and while working as a councillor elected to Dublin City Council. Two years ago, Deputy Mark Wall and I, when we were in the Seanad, brought forward a motion there. Today, we see that work coming to the Dáil.
I warmly welcome all those who join us in the Visitors Gallery today, the residents from across Stoneybatter, Smithfield, Broadstone and Phibsborough, along with Rory Hawkins from SIPTU, who has joined us for this debate today.
I think it is fair to say that, three months ago, when Dublin City Council made its decision to finally start banning bin bags across communities in the constituency that I represent, it very much hit a nerve with residents. The council effectively made a policy decision but left it to the private bin companies to decide how to implement those changes. There was consternation at that result, and rightly so. For most households, the impact was going to be a doubling, trebling or even more of an increase in their existing waste costs. They were going to see a reduced incentive to reduce their waste because many would have to sign up to an annual standing charge as opposed to the pay-per-bag or pay-per-drop system they currently have. They were facing the prospect of the proliferation of unsightly bins sitting on the streets seven days a week. The reality is that many of the people in the constituency that I represent do not have a front garden or back garden. Their houses open onto narrow streets, yet very little account has been taken of that in the decision to move to wheelie bins or caddies.
With this outpouring of anger and frustration at the manner in which the changes are being handled by Dublin City Council, our communities have begun to see just how dysfunctional our waste system is. In recent weeks, I have seen a huge call for reform and an appetite for reform. That is why we have so many people sitting in on this final session of the Dáil today before we rise for the summer. They passionately believe that we need to have a better system in place.
The announcement in April is phase 3 of Dublin City Council’s plan to ban bags across 900 streets in the city that are currently exempt from bins. While the first two phases were in commercial areas, this current phase is the first attempt to introduce it in a residential area. There is an irony in terms of how it is being rolled out. Dublin City Council was able to negotiate for the installation of ten-tonne compactors in the commercial areas, yet when it came to the residential areas, I understand the council tried to negotiate with the bin collectors on the roll-out of shared collection systems, but to no avail. That pretty much sums up our dysfunctional system. Local authorities rely on private bin companies for waste collection, which is effectively a public service across our communities, yet our local authorities exert little or no power over them.
Our lopsided system means that multiple private bin companies get to drive the same roads in some areas and provide no service elsewhere. They have the luxury of driving past illegally dumped waste and litter on our streets, while local authorities have to spend millions every year cleaning up the mess. Providers get to charge what they want, with some companies making very handsome profits. They are the companies whose profits we are actually aware of, but many other companies are unlimited, so we do not know what they earn. The result is that we have serious underinvestment in public recycling and composting facilities.
Back in 2018, the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission said in very clear terms that the current waste management system in Ireland is inefficient, and that Ireland needs an economic regulator for waste companies. Eight years on, households remain at the mercy of unregulated price increases, and there is zero transparency over companies providing a crucial public utility. No other European city does it like this, and nor should we.
Our Bill sets out to make three fundamental changes to the Waste Management Act 1996. First, we provide for local authorities to be able to appoint a single operator for their local authority area. This would be a radical move away from what is called competition in the market to competition for the market. The reality is that section 2 and section 3 of the 1996 Act exclude local authorities from making waste collection arrangements in their area. Ironically, every time I submit a written parliamentary question to the Minister, and when I ask about waste management and local authorities, the Minister tells me that the statutory responsibility for decisions on waste collection arrangements, including any move towards franchise tendering, ultimately rests with the chief executive of each local authority.
I believe he is wrong on that, and, for whatever reason, the Department is misinterpreting the legislation. The reason I say that is that the Waste Management Act 1996 does confer powers on each local authority chief executive, but it was very clear in the High Court case Nurendale Ltd. v . Dublin City Council in 2009 that no chief executive could safely use those powers to restructure the waste collection market in his or her area. A chief executive cannot move to a franchise tendering system conferring exclusive rights without proper legislative underpinning. That is why we are here today.
Second, our Bill sets down conditions for the awarding of a waste management contract. It must specify the number of years. It must specify where exactly the contract applies because, again, we know that even in some pockets of Dublin, there is no waste collection service. We know that in some rural areas there is no service, but it also happens in urban areas. We also want to see a waiver scheme on grounds of personal hardship introduced and, crucially, coverage for all areas.
The third key part of our Bill is with regard to landlord responsibility. This is something that Dublin City Council and other local authorities are very much seeking from the Government. As a TD for Dublin Central, I am acutely aware of how very real comfort and deprivation live cheek by jowl. There is appalling exploitation of people right across my constituency who are in desperate need of appropriate accommodation and who are crammed into three- and four-bedroom houses where there could be 16 people. It is an inhumane squeezing of people into tenement-like conditions, and it is landlords who are facilitating it. To be fair, the least of the worries of many of those tenants is where they put their black bags, but we need to make sure that landlords are forced to have a waste management contract for every house or apartment they let.
We felt moved to introduce this Bill because we believe the privatised system of waste collection is not working. The theory of competition was supposed to deliver choice and affordable pricing but the evidence is very much to the contrary. We know that residents have faced extraordinary price increases in collection services in recent years. Panda’s bin collection prices have risen by 43% since 2024. The City Bin Company increased its charges by 26% in the past two years. Greyhound’s last increase was 48%, back in 2024, and we expect to see another announcement from it soon.
In May of this year, EU waste disposal rules came into force banning the export of waste beyond EU borders. That will force a further hike for households. The reality is that five years ago we were exporting about 70 million tonnes from our shores every year, and that has now doubled in five years.
The second key reason we believe we need to move away from the privatised system is that, ultimately, many of the private bin companies are effectively creaming profits from bin collection, with local authorities having to spend millions of euro. Dublin City Council has to spend millions of euro collecting 3,500 tonnes of illegally dumped waste on our streets every year. The reality is that we have serious underinvestment in recycling. The Government has effectively admitted that recycling rates have plateaued at about 41%, when we have serious targets to try to meet by 2030.
We know from looking at the accounts of some companies that they are making serious profits. We have no transparency as to what two of the biggest operators are earning because they are unlimited companies. Panda’s parent company, Beauparc, sold for €1.3 billion in 2021 to an Australian investment firm. It is also co-owned by a US private equity firm. They are not in Ireland for the good of their health. They are here because they know they can make serious money. We know Greyhound’s parent company is registered on the Isle of Man. Again, that speaks volumes about the types of company we are dealing with here.
Yesterday on the radio, the Irish Waste Management Association said it believed a conversation needed to be had about the price of what we were proposing here. I say to it: bring it on. Back in 2018, the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission very clearly called for an economic regulator. In 2020, we saw a price monitoring group, which involved a very pale shade of economic regulation and certainly not price regulation. It was just looking at the prices. We need to make sure that householders are paying a fair price.
The third key reason we need to move away from a privatised system of waste collection is that the promise of choice is failing. In my constituency, we see bin lorries traipsing around after one another, with all the congestion, confusion and diesel emissions that go with that. In Dublin 15 and other parts of Dublin, a single operator is effectively operating as a monopoly. There is no competition there. The company is hiking up prices and getting away with it.
I am very worried about the consolidation within the waste management sector. Back in 2012, analysis by my colleague in SIPTU, Michael Taft, showed that we had 81 bin companies across the country. Within a decade, by 2022, we were down to about 30 to 40. That number is going to contract in the future. Therefore, we will have extraordinary over-reliance on very large companies, with the State exerting little or no control over them. That is why we need to change our system. In transforming how we deal with waste in this country, I want to see the State take control of this vital public service. Ultimately, I see this legislation as a stepping stone towards local authorities providing this public service. For a variety of legal and practical reasons, however, we believe our Bill has to start in this place. Our Bill effectively provides for competition for the market as opposed to competition in the market. That distinction is important because, by tendering for a single operator, local authorities will be able to start controlling how precisely waste is collected.
It is important to say that, back in the 2000s, Dublin City Council, along with the three other Dublin local authorities, tried to tender for a single operator but failed. It failed because Panda, in the name of Nurendale Limited, brought it to the High Court and, effectively, it lost that case. It lost it because of EU competition law, but we believe the game-changer now is the 2014 EU concessions directive, which allows for tendering by a state, or an agency of the state, for services of general economic interest or general public interest, of which we believe waste is one. As we all know, waste management is not just about a private arrangement because, when it is done badly, it affects us all. That is why I want to see our local authorities moving from being just bystanders that license waste collection companies to actually controlling how the service is delivered.
I introduced this Bill because I do not believe the issue of litter and dumping on our streets, particularly in the communities I represent, where the issue of litter has existed for many years, is hopeless. I do believe change can be made. Inspiration can be taken from many European cities that have got their systems right. They have underground collection systems, compactors in their communities and innovative solutions. The way our system is set up ultimately does not allow for that investment, and I believe we need to change that. We also need to recognise the incredible work so many of our communities are doing against the odds to try to keep their areas clean. That is why I want to pay tribute to all the people who are here today, including Stoneybatter Pride of Place, Phibsboro Village Tidy Towns and all the people working within their communities to keep them clean.
The other key point in all of this is that, for many years, trade unions have spoken about the need to overhaul the system because of the wages, conditions and exploitation that have existed. I pay tribute to the More Power to You campaign. Fórsa, SIPTU and Connect are the three main unions behind it. At the end of the day, waste collection is a public service and the jobs should be decently paid. We spent a lot of time during the pandemic applauding those who had to go out to work, like those collecting our bins, when the rest of us got to stay at home, yet we know the terms and conditions in many of the companies are very poor.
Ultimately, this is very much about local issues, but we need national policy solutions. That is why we have brought forward our Bill. We are very disappointed to hear that the Government is opposing it. I want to pay tribute to colleagues like Deputy McAuliffe and others who sat on an Oireachtas working group on waste management in the previous Dáil and Seanad. We believe we need to change how we do things. We might disagree on the precise detail, but all of us who sat around the table recognised that we need to have change.

---

Source: Houses of the Oireachtas. Licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The Official Report is revised after first publication; the fetch timestamp below identifies the version quoted.

Record URI: https://data.oireachtas.ie/akn/ie/debateRecord/dail/2026-07-16/debate/main
Retrieved: 2026-08-27T06:52:17+00:00
Sitting date: 2026-07-16