CC
Seán Ó Fearghaíl
We are resuming very briefly. Given the complexity and the importance of the legislation before us and the absolute commitment of all of us to get it right, the Minister has a proposal to put to us.
Dail Éireann · 2020-03-19
6 contributions · 3 speakers · 385 words
I heard earlier from many Members of the House that they wanted to see what is commonly referred to as a sunset clause in respect of the emergency powers. There are quite a few amendments down, all endeavouring, from my interpretation, to achieve the same effect, that the emergency health powers would have a time limit and if the time limit were to be extended it would require the consent of these Houses.
There are a number of amendments we believe would have unintended consequences in terms of where they are placed in the Bill, including a number that we believe would interfere with the social welfare provisions, which nobody wishes to do. My officials are working with the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel and the likes to propose a ministerial amendment that I would present to the House.
Built by scoring every sentence in the debate on how distinctive its language is, then quoting the highest-scoring ones back word for word and in the order spoken. Nothing is paraphrased or invented — if a sentence appears here, it was said in the chamber. Drawn from 385 words across 6 contributions by 3 speakers.
How often each word appears across the whole debate, ranked by how distinctive it is to it rather than common to all parliamentary language.
All 6 contributions, start to finish, in the order they were made.
We are resuming very briefly. Given the complexity and the importance of the legislation before us and the absolute commitment of all of us to get it right, the Minister has a proposal to put to us.
I heard earlier from many Members of the House that they wanted to see what is commonly referred to as a sunset clause in respect of the emergency powers. I indicated on the record of the House a willingness to do that. We obviously just want to make sure it is done correctly. There are quite a few amendments down, all endeavouring, from my interpretation, to achieve the same effect, that the emergency health powers would have a time limit and if the time limit were to be extended it would require the consent of these Houses. We need to do that right. There are a number of amendments we believe would have unintended consequences in terms of where they are placed in the Bill, including a number that we believe would interfere with the social welfare provisions, which nobody wishes to do. My officials are working with the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel and the likes to propose a ministerial amendment that I would present to the House. To do so, a Cheann Comhairle, we are seeking a little more time.
The proposal is that we would adjourn until 7 o'clock, when the various pieces of work that have to be done, not just by the Department but also by our own Bills Office, would be completed and the groupings would be complete. We would be able to come back and deal with the legislation at that stage. Are Members amenable to suspending?
It would just be useful, because it looks like that is the amendment the Minister is going to accept, if the Minister would be able to tell us if there is a specific date he has in mind for it. At least when that amendment comes forward, he would have the input of the House so it could be passed if that was agreeable to the House.
Rather than debating the amendment on the floor of the House, what I would be more than happy to do is interact with Deputies between now and the House resuming at 7 p.m.
Is that agreed? Agreed.