FAQ
Short answers. If something here is wrong or missing, it should be — this page is meant to grow.
A search engine over the official record of what is said in Dáil Éireann and Seanad Éireann, and how members voted.
Updated on 01:00 GMT Monday.
Directly from the Houses of the Oireachtas open data API, which publishes the Official Report. Nothing here is typed in or edited by hand — it is the published record, reorganised so it can be searched.
2020-01-21 to Present. Earlier material exists in the source archive going back to 1919, and the pipeline can be pointed at it, but it is not loaded here.
Because it is deliberately the party they held on the day they spoke, not the party they are in now. Members change party, and most archives quietly relabel their old speeches. A contribution from 2020 here carries its speaker's 2020 party.
Three things worth knowing:
By default every word you type has to appear in the same contribution.
mica redress |
Both words, in the same contribution |
"mica redress" |
That exact phrase |
housing OR homes |
Either word |
housing -dublin |
Housing, but not anything mentioning Dublin |
hous* |
Starts with: housing, housed, householder |
Yes and no, in Irish. A vote in the Dáil or Seanad is called a division: Tá is a vote in favour, Níl against, and Staon is an abstention.
No, and this is worth being precise about. Each summary is built by scoring every sentence in the debate on how distinctive its wording is, then quoting the highest-scoring sentences back word for word and in the order spoken. Nothing is paraphrased or generated. If a sentence appears in a summary, somebody said it in the chamber.
That is a deliberate choice for a record people may want to cite. A language model writing its own prose could smooth over or invent detail, and here the text is the evidence.
A count of how often each word appears in that debate, ranked by how distinctive it is to that debate rather than common to all parliamentary language. That is why "housing" or "mica" rises to the top while "deputy" and "amendment" do not.
For a small number of older divisions the Oireachtas did not record whether the motion carried, but the vote counts survived. Where those counts differ, the result follows arithmetically and is shown — labelled as derived, so you know it was calculated here rather than published.
Because the source data does not contain it. The Oireachtas API publishes no date of birth, and returns an empty gender field for every member in this period. Showing such a breakdown would mean inventing it.
No. They are chosen so that parties stay distinguishable to colour-blind readers and in greyscale. Several parties genuinely share a colour family — Fianna Fáil, Sinn Féin, the Greens and Aontú are all green — so the abbreviation on each chip, not the colour, is what identifies a party.
Yes. The Official Report is published by the Houses of the Oireachtas under a CC BY 4.0 licence, which asks only that you credit the source. Every download from this site includes the record's address and the exact time it was fetched — the Report can be revised after publication, so a citation without a timestamp cannot be checked later.
Measured rather than asserted. 99.6% of contributions resolve to a named member, the search has been evaluated against a hand-checked question set, and the gaps in the source data are documented rather than hidden.