◎ OireachtasDB

← Brendan Howlin

Rhetoric and votes

Brendan Howlin

Experimental measure. Read the method before quoting a number.
This compares the position a member expressed in a debate with the way they voted in the division that debate produced. It is not a measure of honesty. A member who argues against a Bill and then votes against it scores as aligned; so does one who never departs from a party line they also argue for. Voting against your own stated view under a party whip is ordinary parliamentary behaviour, which is why the whip breakdown below sits next to the headline rather than underneath it. Full method and validation →
—
only 8 scorable votes — below the 10 needed for an interval worth printing
100%
voted with their own party's majority · 640 votes

Why the denominator is small

The measure only exists where this member actually spoke in the debate their vote belongs to, and where that vote can be tied to a specific question. Both cuts are steep.

Votes cast646
… spoke in that debate section51
… vote tied to a specific question30
… position stated clearly enough to score8

The third row is the sharpest cut. A committee-stage sitting can hold fifteen divisions while its speeches discuss forty-two numbered amendments, and the record does not say which amendment each division was. Those votes are counted here and deliberately left unscored rather than guessed.

Alignment against the whip

The same scorable votes, split by whether the member went with their party. The top-right cell is the one worth reading: a stated position reversed while following the party line.

Voted with own partyVoted against own party
Matched their words 6 0
Contradicted their words 2 0

Not scored: 21 where the vote could not be tied to a question, 0 where no clear position was stated in the debate.

Where the words and the vote diverge

Every case the pipeline flagged, with the contribution it read and the vote as recorded. Judge them yourself — that is the point of showing them rather than only the rate.

2020-07-30 · Civil Law and Criminal Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2020 [Seanad]: Second Stage · Question put: · Carried

Read as support (cue, confidence 0.90) · voted NIL · with their party

I agree with Deputy Martin Kenny that the normal way of dealing with justice legislation is to have a protracted discussion, pre-legislative scrutiny and then a detailed Committee Stage debate. We should not vary from that, except to deal with issues that are absolutely imperative, a point I raised during the briefings. There are number of component parts of this omnibus Bill. I wish to address the part dealing with …

Full contribution → · The division →

2020-05-13 · An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business · Question put: · Lost

Read as support (cue, confidence 0.85) · voted NIL · with their party

Most of us were taken by surprise when we saw this on the Order Paper to be taken without debate. Those of us who lived through the period when this report was commissioned and so on understand how fraught an era that was. It would be useful to have a more considered period before the report is withdrawn. Perhaps the Ceann Comhairle could inform the House, from a procedural point of view, how a report that has been f…

Full contribution → · The division →

Tone

Valence runs −1 (negative) to +1 (positive). This is a separate measure from alignment above and says nothing about how anyone voted — "the Minister has been asleep at the wheel" is strongly negative and carries no position on the question.

ModelSpeeches scored Mean valenceCorpus mean
vader503 +0.337 +0.423

Which policies move them

Mean tone by topic, most negative first. Topics come from an LDA model fitted over debate contributions; the terms are the model's, the labels are hand-assigned.

TopicSpeechesMean valence
Children, families and young people children · women · young · child · family · families 8 -0.225
Justice, policing and defence garda · defence · justice · violence · criminal · gardaí 29 +0.015
War, Ukraine, Israel and human rights international · ireland · ukraine · israel · war · irish 44 +0.053
Employment, welfare schemes and business supports scheme · businesses · payment · sector · employment · insurance 6 +0.260
Housing, rent and homelessness housing · homes · local · accommodation · rent · affordable 5 +0.325
Legislation, courts and legal process act · legislation · shall · court · person · information 119 +0.420
Covid-19 and public health emergency covid · health · public · pandemic · measures · safety 22 +0.474
Procedural and rhetorical filler (low-content) important · like · good · debate · did · does 76 +0.492
Health services, HSE and disability health · services · care · service · hse · mental 7 +0.501
Cost of living, tax and budget cost · tax · budget · energy · costs · increase 5 +0.595
Party-political exchange (party names dominate) workers · rights · right · sinn · féin · irish 14 +0.626
EU and international relations ireland · european · irish · union · europe · countries 44 +0.669

Departures from their own baseline

Contributions whose tone sits more than two standard deviations from this member's own average. Baselines are per member on purpose — an absolute threshold would just rank people by temperament.

2020-12-17 · Harassment, Harmful Communications and Related Offences Bill 2017: Report and Final Stages · z = -2.3 · Legislation, courts and legal process
I move amendment No. 17: In page 5, line 14, after “ section 2 or 3 ” to insert “or section 10 of the Non-Fatal Offences against the Person Act 1997”. As the Ceann Comhairle said, we discussed this issue on Committee Stage. In the original Bill I drafted, to a…

Full contribution →

2020-12-17 · Harassment, Harmful Communications and Related Offences Bill 2017: Report and Final Stages · z = -2.3 · Justice, policing and defence
People will know this Bill has been a long time in gestation since I introduced it three years ago. Technology has changed as well and so we need to look very carefully at every aspect of it. All of the debate thus far on the Bill has focused on the sharing of…

Full contribution →

2024-03-07 · Human Rights · z = -2.3
I welcome the views set out by the Tánaiste, but I am anxious to know what is going to happen as a result of those actions. The situation is a crisis. It is like watching what happened in Rwanda where there were mass deaths. The world is outraged, but what is …

Full contribution →

2020-12-01 · Proceeds of Crime (Gross Human Rights Abuses) Bill 2020: First Stage · z = -2.3 · Legislation, courts and legal process
I move: That leave be granted to introduce a Bill entitled an Act to provide, in connection with the proceeds of crime, that certain conduct occurring outside the State is criminal conduct notwithstanding that it does not constitute an offence under the law of…

Full contribution →

2024-09-25 · Criminal Justice (Amendment) Bill 2024: Committee and Remaining Stages · z = -2.3 · Children, families and young people
I am just trying to understand the logic of it. Clearly, the Children Act does not apply to anybody who is over 18. The Minister's base point is, as I understand it, that anomalous category. My contention is that you cannot create a perfect equality between so…

Full contribution →

2020-06-03 · Covid-19 (Foreign Affairs and Trade): Statements · z = -2.3 · War, Ukraine, Israel and human rights
As most people confine themselves to their homes or least to their home areas, major issues are unfolding across our world. The murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis, which was seen by all of us, seen by the world, opened up yet again the unresolved cancer of …

Full contribution →

2021-07-06 · Domestic, Sexual and Gender-based Violence: Statements · z = -2.3 · Justice, policing and defence
I warmly welcome the tabling of these statements and the opportunity to contribute to the debate. I strongly support the very direct words of the Taoiseach in his opening remarks to victims of domestic violence - largely women, as well as some children and men…

Full contribution →

2020-12-17 · Harassment, Harmful Communications and Related Offences Bill 2017: Report and Final Stages · z = -2.3 · Legislation, courts and legal process
I thank the Minister of State for accepting the potential of my proposed subsection (2). I do not know whether it is technically possible to amend my amendment simply to add that subsection to the existing section 4. The Ceann Comhairle might be able to advise…

Full contribution →

2023-11-08 · Post-European Council Meeting: Statements · z = -2.3 · War, Ukraine, Israel and human rights
Clearly, one issue dominated the European Council and, indeed, dominates all our thoughts in this House, in this country and in Europe and beyond. The carnage we are witnessing on a daily basis in Gaza is truly sickening. Our first priority must be to halt the…

Full contribution →

2021-11-24 · Criminal Justice (Smuggling of Persons) Bill 2021 [Seanad]: Committee Stage · z = -2.3 · Procedural and rhetorical filler (low-content)
If I could make mention since the Minister of State has raised the issue, I was unaware when I came in that there had been a tragedy. I had been working in my office. Last weekend, I went down to the memorial site in Drinagh Business Park because on 8 December…

Full contribution →

2022-02-02 · Ceisteanna ar Reachtaíocht a Gealladh - Questions on Promised Legislation · z = -2.3
I raise with the Taoiseach legislation the House passed on Second Stage last December, in its final act of the previous session, namely, the Proceeds of Crime (Gross Human Rights Abuses) Bill 2020. I introduced the Bill which is what is known as a Magnitsky Ac…

Full contribution →

2022-11-16 · Post-European Council: Statements · z = -2.3 · War, Ukraine, Israel and human rights
All European debate is still dominated by the ongoing invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation. It remains critical that Russia is called out at every international forum, whether a meeting of the EU Council, the Inter-Parliamentary Union, which recently …

Full contribution →

The whip, across the whole corpus

Alignment by the party a member sat for on the day, with 95% Wilson intervals. This is the test the measure could have failed.

PartyAligned95% CI n
PBP 82.5% 68–91% 40
LAB 78.2% 69–85% 101
IND 76.5% 72–81% 327
SF 75.8% 69–81% 198
SD 71.4% 58–82% 49
FG 69.1% 62–76% 162
FF 67.9% 60–75% 165
GP 56.8% 41–71% 37

Members of government parties align their stated position with their vote 9.4 points less often than Independents — bootstrap 95% CI [+2.7, +16.0], which excludes zero. Opposition parties sit 9.5 points above government too, CI [+3.1, +15.9]. Independents and opposition members are indistinguishable from each other (−0.0 points, CI [−6.3, +6.2]). So the gap does not come from having no party; it comes from being in government, which is what a whip effect should look like. Read this as the measure behaving sensibly, not as a finding about any individual.

How the scorer scores

Two automated methods were built and both failed. What survives is the rule-based layer, which is why the coverage above is narrow.

MethodAccuracy95% CI n
nli-vs-mover-anchor:deberta 35.9% 29–42% 234
nli-vs-mover-anchor:distilroberta 11.5% 8–16% 234

Zero-shot entailment was asked to judge contributions whose true position is known — the member moved the amendment, so the answer is support by construction — and got it right 11.5% of the time, returning "unclear" or "oppose" for nearly everything. A classifier trained on the rule-labelled cases over the corpus embeddings reached 71.1% against a 65.3% majority-class baseline: better than chance, not better enough. Both are excluded from every figure on this page. Only the rule-based cascade, which is exact where it fires and silent where it does not, is used.

Method

Position is read from the member's own contributions in the debate section the division belongs to, by a three-step cascade: an explicit move of the question ("I move amendment No. 5", true by construction); declarative stance phrases ordered so negations are tested first, because "I cannot support" and "I do not oppose" both defeat a naive keyword match; and, where neither fires, a zero-shot entailment model judging the contribution against the question put. Tone uses a separate model and is reported separately. Agreement against hand-labelled cases, with bootstrap intervals, is on the evidence page; no score here should be read without it.