I will take the movers of amendment No. 2 first and then Senator McDowell.
On prevailing side: this member voted with the winning side in 440 of 443 decisive votes (0 abstentions excluded). Read it as a government-or-opposition indicator rather than a measure of influence — the figure is near 100% for members supporting the government of the day and near 0% for those opposing it.
This is the point of the site: contributions keep the party held on the day, not the one held now.
| Party | Recorded as | Contributions | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC | Ceann Comhairle / Chair | 2,606 | 2020-07-30 – 2022-12-12 |
| FG | Fine Gael | 405 | 2020-01-21 – 2026-07-08 |
Membership spells on record: FG 1989-10-01–1992-12-17 · FG 2007-07-23–2011-04-25 · FG 2011-02-25–2016-03-09 · FG 2016-03-10–2020-03-29 · FG 2020-03-30–2025-01-29 · FG 2025-01-29–present
I will take the movers of amendment No. 2 first and then Senator McDowell.
With respect to Senator Boyhan, there is no attempt to prevent him speaking.
The procedure when amendments are grouped is that the Senator who proposed the amendment speaks and then the floor is open to the whole House.
There is certainly no intention of reducing Senator Boyhan's speaking time.
Before I call the next speaker, I note that we allowed some initial latitude as propositions were made and so on. I ask Senators to now speak specifically to the amendment, which proposes that an annual report be issued. We will also speak specifically to the subsequent amendments and in that way we will have an efficient debate. I call Senator Mullen.
I ask the Senator to speak to the amendment.
The Senator must speak to the amendment.
Senator Pauline O'Reilly has indicated.
It was not directed at the Senator personally.
Senator Pauline O'Reilly will have to withdraw the word "untrue".
I thank Senator O'Reilly. It certainly was not directed at anybody.
Amendments Nos. 3, 5, 10, 95 and 97 are related and may be discussed together by agreement. Is that agreed? Agreed.
That is an order of the House made previous to the debate.
That is a point well made and repeated.
I am grateful that people have developed a great relevance to the amendments in their statements.
That is not relevant in the context of these amendments.
I call Senator Boyhan strictly on the amendment.
I call Senator Ruane. I think she had indicated next.
I thank the Senator for an exemplary illustration of staying relevant. I call Senator Higgins.
Senator Boyhan has a supplementary point.