With respect, the Attorney General's advice, as it is the national law, will trump the Senators' legal advice.
On prevailing side: this member voted with the winning side in 440 of 443 decisive votes (0 abstentions excluded). Read it as a government-or-opposition indicator rather than a measure of influence — the figure is near 100% for members supporting the government of the day and near 0% for those opposing it.
This is the point of the site: contributions keep the party held on the day, not the one held now.
| Party | Recorded as | Contributions | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC | Ceann Comhairle / Chair | 2,606 | 2020-07-30 – 2022-12-12 |
| FG | Fine Gael | 405 | 2020-01-21 – 2026-07-08 |
Membership spells on record: FG 1989-10-01–1992-12-17 · FG 2007-07-23–2011-04-25 · FG 2011-02-25–2016-03-09 · FG 2016-03-10–2020-03-29 · FG 2020-03-30–2025-01-29 · FG 2025-01-29–present
With respect, the Attorney General's advice, as it is the national law, will trump the Senators' legal advice.
Absolutely. I call the Minister of State.
Does Senator Doherty wish to continue?
I thank Senator Doherty. Are there any other comments on amendment No. 3? Senator Craughwell will not repeat the same legal advice. The Senator may comment.
I appreciate that the Senator has made his point. We will have to move on.
The Minister of State had begun to clarify that.
I ask that we let the Minister of State respond.
I thank Senator Doherty.
I wanted to be fair to the Leader of the House. We took the legal advice and her commentary on board and-----
I have two comments to make. No one would impugn her personal integrity, which is above reproach, regarding the comments made. I appreciate that she will not hold up Committee Stage, but I would appreciate if she could let the Minister of State respond.
It was just that you made the comment that people were impugning your integrity.
We will do that but Senator Craughwell has a comment to make.
To be helpful, the Senator would have to go to the Committee of Parliamentary Privileges and Oversight. We are on Committee Stage by order of the House. Any processes involving Article 7 are under the committee and outside the remit of the House.
If Senator Craughwell wants to invoke Standing Order 70, he would have to go to the Committee of Parliamentary Privileges and Oversight and follow a process there. We are now on Committee Stage by order of the House.
We must proceed from where we are.
We are not suspending. I am following the order of the House. Anyway, make your comment. We want to be fair.
You have had great latitude, Senator. Can you wrap up and then the question will be put?
I know that but we are wandering away from the amendment.
Then make the comment.
That is for a different forum.