◎ OireachtasDB

← Mary Butler

Rhetoric and votes

Mary Butler

Experimental measure. Read the method before quoting a number.
This compares the position a member expressed in a debate with the way they voted in the division that debate produced. It is not a measure of honesty. A member who argues against a Bill and then votes against it scores as aligned; so does one who never departs from a party line they also argue for. Voting against your own stated view under a party whip is ordinary parliamentary behaviour, which is why the whip breakdown below sits next to the headline rather than underneath it. Full method and validation →
—
only 5 scorable votes — below the 10 needed for an interval worth printing
100%
voted with their own party's majority · 1,088 votes

Why the denominator is small

The measure only exists where this member actually spoke in the debate their vote belongs to, and where that vote can be tied to a specific question. Both cuts are steep.

Votes cast1,092
… spoke in that debate section99
… vote tied to a specific question83
… position stated clearly enough to score5

The third row is the sharpest cut. A committee-stage sitting can hold fifteen divisions while its speeches discuss forty-two numbered amendments, and the record does not say which amendment each division was. Those votes are counted here and deliberately left unscored rather than guessed.

Alignment against the whip

The same scorable votes, split by whether the member went with their party. The top-right cell is the one worth reading: a stated position reversed while following the party line.

Voted with own partyVoted against own party
Matched their words 1 0
Contradicted their words 4 0

Not scored: 16 where the vote could not be tied to a question, 0 where no clear position was stated in the debate.

Where the words and the vote diverge

Every case the pipeline flagged, with the contribution it read and the vote as recorded. Judge them yourself — that is the point of showing them rather than only the rate.

2022-07-12 · Confidence in Government: Motion · Question put: · Carried

Read as oppose (cue, confidence 0.90) · voted TA · with their party

The Deputies from that party who have gone on radio and television in recent days apparently believe they are Ministers-elect and want to force an election as soon as possible. It is a pity they were not so eager to act in the immediate wake of the most recent election. They chose instead to prioritise political opportunism over the national interest. Those of us on this side of the House acted and worked in collabor…

Full contribution → · The division →

2023-12-05 · Confidence in the Minister for Justice: Motion · Question put: · Carried

Read as oppose (cue, confidence 0.85) · voted TA · with their party

The party of political opportunism strikes again. Those in Sinn Féin were not so opportunistic back in 2020 when they had the chance to go into government. They chose instead to avoid the responsibility and leave the job of leading the country through a pandemic to someone else, thankfully. Sinn Féin decided they would take the course that benefited them most. They chose to sit on the sidelines in opposition and seek…

Full contribution → · The division →

2025-07-09 · Mental Health Bill 2024: Report and Final Stages · Question put: · Carried

Read as oppose (cue, confidence 0.80) · voted TA · with their party

I do not believe amendment No. 29 is necessary as, under the Bill, a person may only be involuntarily admitted when the consultant psychiatrist believes that person has a mental disorder that meets the criteria for involuntary admission. If at any point during the person's admission the responsible consultant psychiatrist no longer believes the person meets the criteria for involuntary admission, that person must be …

Full contribution → · The division →

2025-05-07 · An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business · Question put: "That the amendment to the Order of Business is hereby negatived and the proposed arrangements for the week's business are hereby agreed to." · Carried

Read as oppose (cue, confidence 0.80) · voted TA · with their party

I move: Wednesday’s business shall be: - Motion re First Report of the Committee of Selection and appointment of Cathaoirligh (any division claimed to be taken immediately) - Motion re Appointment of Ordinary Members to the Houses of the Oireachtas Commission (any division claimed to be taken immediately) - Motion re Dissolution of Select Committee on Subsidiarity (European Union Legislative Scrutiny) - Statements to…

Full contribution → · The division →

Tone

Valence runs −1 (negative) to +1 (positive). This is a separate measure from alignment above and says nothing about how anyone voted — "the Minister has been asleep at the wheel" is strongly negative and carries no position on the question.

ModelSpeeches scored Mean valenceCorpus mean
vader2,090 +0.589 +0.423

Which policies move them

Mean tone by topic, most negative first. Topics come from an LDA model fitted over debate contributions; the terms are the model's, the labels are hand-assigned.

TopicSpeechesMean valence
Party-political exchange (party names dominate) workers · rights · right · sinn · féin · irish 5 +0.203
Legislation, courts and legal process act · legislation · shall · court · person · information 238 +0.533
Children, families and young people children · women · young · child · family · families 74 +0.554
Health scandals, inquiries and bereaved families hospital · families · family · cancer · children · did 34 +0.572
Climate, agriculture, energy and water water · climate · farmers · energy · food · agriculture 12 +0.605
Covid-19 and public health emergency covid · health · public · pandemic · measures · safety 78 +0.640
Procedural and rhetorical filler (low-content) important · like · good · debate · did · does 117 +0.681
Justice, policing and defence garda · defence · justice · violence · criminal · gardaí 5 +0.717
Health services, HSE and disability health · services · care · service · hse · mental 625 +0.719
Transport, Dublin and rural development local · transport · dublin · city · public · community 22 +0.753
Employment, welfare schemes and business supports scheme · businesses · payment · sector · employment · insurance 33 +0.759
Housing, rent and homelessness housing · homes · local · accommodation · rent · affordable 9 +0.793
Departmental programmes and funding (diffuse) department · national · funding · new · important · programme 418 +0.806
Local government, roads and regional funding county · cork · discuss · west · road · local 14 +0.835
Education and schools school · education · schools · children · students · special 42 +0.842
Cost of living, tax and budget cost · tax · budget · energy · costs · increase 5 +0.878
EU and international relations ireland · european · irish · union · europe · countries 12 +0.921

Departures from their own baseline

Contributions whose tone sits more than two standard deviations from this member's own average. Baselines are per member on purpose — an absolute threshold would just rank people by temperament.

2020-11-12 · Suicide Incidence · z = -3.4 · Children, families and young people
I thank both Deputies for raising this important issue. Any loss to suicide is a tragedy and I send my deepest condolences to the families, friends and communities affected. Each suicide affects the entire community and it is important that strong supports are…

Full contribution →

2024-04-16 · National Cancer Strategy: Motion [Private Members] · z = -3.4 · Departmental programmes and funding (diffuse)
I move: To delete all words after "Dáil Éireann" and substitute the following: "recognises and notes: — the work of our healthcare workers in improving the health outcomes for patients with cancer; — the improvement in survival rates in Ireland during the curr…

Full contribution →

2025-05-08 · Suicide Prevention · z = -3.4 · Departmental programmes and funding (diffuse)
I look forward to walking on my own Darkness into Light walk in Portlaw this weekend. I normally attend the one in Waterford city but this time I am staying local. It is great to see all of these walks. Initially, they were in the big cities and towns but now …

Full contribution →

2025-06-25 · Ceisteanna ar Pholasaí nó ar Reachtaíocht - Questions on Policy or Legislation · z = -3.4
I thank the Deputy for raising this really important issue of cancer care. While still too high, cancer mortality rates in Ireland are falling faster than the EU average, having fallen by 17% between 2011 and 2021 compared with the EU average of 12%. Five-year…

Full contribution →

2023-06-22 · Care of the Elderly · z = -3.4 · Health services, HSE and disability
No, I am fine. I would like to assure the Deputy that my Department is engaging closely with the HSE to ensure that this is undertaken in a timely and comprehensive manner. There is already a strong framework of standards, policies and procedures in place acro…

Full contribution →

2025-06-25 · Mental Health Bill 2024: Committee Stage (Resumed) · z = -3.3 · Legislation, courts and legal process
I move amendment No. 283: In page 160, after line 13, to insert the following: “PART 9 CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO OTHER ACTS Amendment of Defence Act 1954 208. The Defence Act 1954 is amended— (a) in section 202— (i) in subsection (1)(b), by the substitution …

Full contribution →

2025-12-09 · Mental Health Bill 2024: Committee Stage (Resumed) · z = -3.3 · Health services, HSE and disability
"Mental illness" is not used in legislation in similar jurisdictions or by international bodies such as the UN. "Mental illness" is not a better term to use in the legislation. There needs to be a legal distinction between the term we use for the condition tha…

Full contribution →

2025-12-09 · Mental Health Bill 2024: Committee Stage (Resumed) · z = -3.3 · Health services, HSE and disability
Amendments Nos. 15 to 17, inclusive, relate to the definition of "mental disorder" and propose to replace it with a definition of "psychosocial disability" or "mental health difficulty". We spent a lot of time debating this in the Dáil. I had expected to debat…

Full contribution →

2025-06-25 · Mental Health Bill 2024: Committee Stage (Resumed) · z = -3.3 · Legislation, courts and legal process
I move amendment No. 284: In page 160, after line 13, to insert the following: “Amendment of Coroners Act 1962 209. (1) The Coroners Act 1962 is amended— (a) in section 2, in the definition of “State custody or detention”— (i) by the deletion of paragraph (d),…

Full contribution →

2026-04-16 · Mental Health Bill 2024: Report and Final Stages · z = -3.3 · Health services, HSE and disability
That will bring it to 45 suicide crisis assessment nurses, SCAN, in total in 2026. They work in the community closely with GPs. I announced six more teams. They work in pairs. One team follows on from the CAMHS team in Portiuncula Hospital to support young Tra…

Full contribution →

2023-12-06 · School Transport · z = -3.2 · Transport, Dublin and rural development
I understand the Senator's frustration. It must be acknowledged that 149,000 children travelled to school on a school bus last year. Many of them had additional needs and were accompanied on the bus. It is an enormous logistical operation. As the country is at…

Full contribution →

2021-12-03 · Misuse of Drugs · z = -3.2
Could I request, when I am on my feet, that the Deputy's microphone might be turned off so I can get the opportunity to reply? The report of the working group on alternative approaches to the possession of drugs for personal use published in 2019 noted difficu…

Full contribution →

The whip, across the whole corpus

Alignment by the party a member sat for on the day, with 95% Wilson intervals. This is the test the measure could have failed.

PartyAligned95% CI n
PBP 82.5% 68–91% 40
LAB 78.2% 69–85% 101
IND 76.5% 72–81% 327
SF 75.8% 69–81% 198
SD 71.4% 58–82% 49
FG 69.1% 62–76% 162
FF 67.9% 60–75% 165
GP 56.8% 41–71% 37

Members of government parties align their stated position with their vote 9.4 points less often than Independents — bootstrap 95% CI [+2.7, +16.0], which excludes zero. Opposition parties sit 9.5 points above government too, CI [+3.1, +15.9]. Independents and opposition members are indistinguishable from each other (−0.0 points, CI [−6.3, +6.2]). So the gap does not come from having no party; it comes from being in government, which is what a whip effect should look like. Read this as the measure behaving sensibly, not as a finding about any individual.

How the scorer scores

Two automated methods were built and both failed. What survives is the rule-based layer, which is why the coverage above is narrow.

MethodAccuracy95% CI n
nli-vs-mover-anchor:deberta 35.9% 29–42% 234
nli-vs-mover-anchor:distilroberta 11.5% 8–16% 234

Zero-shot entailment was asked to judge contributions whose true position is known — the member moved the amendment, so the answer is support by construction — and got it right 11.5% of the time, returning "unclear" or "oppose" for nearly everything. A classifier trained on the rule-labelled cases over the corpus embeddings reached 71.1% against a 65.3% majority-class baseline: better than chance, not better enough. Both are excluded from every figure on this page. Only the rule-based cascade, which is exact where it fires and silent where it does not, is used.

Method

Position is read from the member's own contributions in the debate section the division belongs to, by a three-step cascade: an explicit move of the question ("I move amendment No. 5", true by construction); declarative stance phrases ordered so negations are tested first, because "I cannot support" and "I do not oppose" both defeat a naive keyword match; and, where neither fires, a zero-shot entailment model judging the contribution against the question put. Tone uses a separate model and is reported separately. Agreement against hand-labelled cases, with bootstrap intervals, is on the evidence page; no score here should be read without it.