◎ OireachtasDB

← Paul Daly

Rhetoric and votes

Paul Daly

Experimental measure. Read the method before quoting a number.
This compares the position a member expressed in a debate with the way they voted in the division that debate produced. It is not a measure of honesty. A member who argues against a Bill and then votes against it scores as aligned; so does one who never departs from a party line they also argue for. Voting against your own stated view under a party whip is ordinary parliamentary behaviour, which is why the whip breakdown below sits next to the headline rather than underneath it. Full method and validation →
—
only 6 scorable votes — below the 10 needed for an interval worth printing
100%
voted with their own party's majority · 539 votes

Why the denominator is small

The measure only exists where this member actually spoke in the debate their vote belongs to, and where that vote can be tied to a specific question. Both cuts are steep.

Votes cast539
… spoke in that debate section45
… vote tied to a specific question16
… position stated clearly enough to score6

The third row is the sharpest cut. A committee-stage sitting can hold fifteen divisions while its speeches discuss forty-two numbered amendments, and the record does not say which amendment each division was. Those votes are counted here and deliberately left unscored rather than guessed.

Alignment against the whip

The same scorable votes, split by whether the member went with their party. The top-right cell is the one worth reading: a stated position reversed while following the party line.

Voted with own partyVoted against own party
Matched their words 3 0
Contradicted their words 3 0

Not scored: 29 where the vote could not be tied to a question, 0 where no clear position was stated in the debate.

Where the words and the vote diverge

Every case the pipeline flagged, with the contribution it read and the vote as recorded. Judge them yourself — that is the point of showing them rather than only the rate.

2025-11-20 · Horse and Greyhound Racing Fund Regulations 2025: Motion · Question put: "That the motion be agreed to." · Carried

Read as oppose (cue, confidence 0.90) · voted TA · with their party

I welcome the Minister. It seems a little bit repetitive because the agriculture committee meeting was only yesterday evening and we are dealing with the same topic, so it seems like we are repeating ourselves, but when something is important enough to say, it is important enough to say it more than once. I welcome the fund. As I stated yesterday evening and even though most people know, it would be remiss of me not …

Full contribution → · The division →

2021-12-08 · Horse and Greyhound Racing Fund Regulations 2021: Motion · Question put: "That the motion be agreed to." · Carried

Read as oppose (cue, confidence 0.90) · voted TA · with their party

I am delighted to support the motion to extend the upper ceiling for the Horse and Greyhound Racing Fund. I welcome the Minister and his contribution. Four minutes is a short time to speak so I will not rehash the figures and the investment into the fund, and the great role that it plays in rural Ireland. Most, if not all, horse and greyhound trainers are based in rural areas. Having a horse or greyhound trainer can …

Full contribution → · The division →

2026-02-12 · Residential Tenancies (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2026: Second Stage · Question put: · Carried

Read as oppose (cue, confidence 0.21) · voted TA · with their party

I welcome the Bill. I welcome the Minister of State, Deputy Cummins, who has replaced the Minister, Deputy Browne. I compliment both of them along with their officials on taking the steps they did. It is very hard to bring in any legislation which will only have long-term benefits. Some people want to see the gold-plated results the next day and if they do not, they will not make a decision at all. I compliment the M…

Full contribution → · The division →

Tone

Valence runs −1 (negative) to +1 (positive). This is a separate measure from alignment above and says nothing about how anyone voted — "the Minister has been asleep at the wheel" is strongly negative and carries no position on the question.

ModelSpeeches scored Mean valenceCorpus mean
vader208 +0.505 +0.423

Which policies move them

Mean tone by topic, most negative first. Topics come from an LDA model fitted over debate contributions; the terms are the model's, the labels are hand-assigned.

TopicSpeechesMean valence
Health scandals, inquiries and bereaved families hospital · families · family · cancer · children · did 5 +0.028
Climate, agriculture, energy and water water · climate · farmers · energy · food · agriculture 45 +0.364
Procedural and rhetorical filler (low-content) important · like · good · debate · did · does 91 +0.503
Covid-19 and public health emergency covid · health · public · pandemic · measures · safety 10 +0.565
Legislation, courts and legal process act · legislation · shall · court · person · information 6 +0.626
Media, banking and State companies ireland · irish · media · industry · companies · post 6 +0.726
Departmental programmes and funding (diffuse) department · national · funding · new · important · programme 6 +0.831

Departures from their own baseline

Contributions whose tone sits more than two standard deviations from this member's own average. Baselines are per member on purpose — an absolute threshold would just rank people by temperament.

2022-10-19 · Renewable Energy Generation · z = -3.0 · Climate, agriculture, energy and water
I accept the Minister of State's answer. As I said in my initial summation of the issue, the Department at least needs to put the question to Europe. A lot of money is available and is being expended. Neither the State nor the European Union is getting full va…

Full contribution →

2020-07-24 · An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business · z = -3.0 · Climate, agriculture, energy and water
I wish to raise an issue that is of major concern to me and rural Ireland. It is of concern on a broader scale as well. I refer to the control of the noxious weed called ragwort. Anyone who travels on a road will see this yellow weed and to the uninformed, it …

Full contribution →

2024-04-23 · An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business · z = -3.0 · Procedural and rhetorical filler (low-content)
Today, I raise an issue that I have raised previously. Almost every other colleague has raised it before too. It is the infamous issue of passports. We have got away from the pandemic and the backlog it caused. Everyone was given the benefit of the doubt in th…

Full contribution →

2023-11-14 · Invasive Species Policy · z = -2.9 · Climate, agriculture, energy and water
I thank the Minister of State for his response. The kernel of the response was on what was in place before and has expired, and that was the bounty scheme. With the greatest respect to the NPWS and its implementation of the invasive species Acts, identifying a…

Full contribution →

2025-10-14 · Support for Ukraine: Motion · z = -2.9 · Procedural and rhetorical filler (low-content)
I second the motion. I thank our leader, Senator O'Loughlin, and everybody involved in putting the motion together. On 26 February 2022, my father died, four days after the outbreak of the current part of this war because that was not the start of this war, as…

Full contribution →

2021-11-18 · Address to Seanad Éireann by An Taoiseach · z = -2.8 · Climate, agriculture, energy and water
Cuirim fáilte roimh an Taoiseach. There will be no element of surprise; I will be boringly predictable in mentioning agriculture. When I have to condense all that goes therewith into two minutes, I think the buck stops with forestry at the moment. When we talk…

Full contribution →

2023-11-28 · An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business · z = -2.6 · Procedural and rhetorical filler (low-content)
I wish to be associated with the expressions of sympathy on the passing of Tras Honan. While I did not know Tras, I knew her sister, Carrie Acheson, very well through my involvement with the National Ploughing Championships. I send my sympathies to the entire …

Full contribution →

2022-02-16 · Animal Health and Welfare and Forestry (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2021: Committee Stage · z = -2.5 · Procedural and rhetorical filler (low-content)
We are debating over and back. We will not complete Committee Stage tonight and it will need to be resumed on another date. We will then have Report Stage. The three people we are discussing do not even have a date. Can we give them an indication? Once this le…

Full contribution →

2024-04-30 · An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business · z = -2.5 · Procedural and rhetorical filler (low-content)
Like others this morning, I welcome the announcement of the €79.5 million towards the crop affected by ash dieback and the growers who have been affected big-time on this. It is an issue I have raised previously. I warmly welcome today's announcement which wil…

Full contribution →

2023-06-27 · Offences Against the State (Amendment) Act 1998 and Criminal Justice (Amendment) Act 2009: Motions · z = -2.3
We will now deal with No. 5, motion regarding the continuance of the Offences Against the State (Amendment) Act 1998 and No. 6, motion regarding the Criminal Justice (Amendment) Act 2009. Both motions will be debated together and decided separately. I call on …

Full contribution →

2023-11-14 · An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business · z = -2.3 · Climate, agriculture, energy and water
I will raise what is a very serious issue for me and many others out there. We are fortunate that we had no fatalities on our roads on the back of Storm Debi over the weekend. I have no doubt that, if we had, I would not be the only one raising the issue of as…

Full contribution →

2024-09-24 · An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business · z = -2.2 · Covid-19 and public health emergency
I raise with the Leader the ongoing issue of long waiting times for driving tests. I base this on an article in today's The Journal under the headline, "Crackdown on long-held provisional licenses delayed over fears of longer test waiting lists". It refers to …

Full contribution →

The whip, across the whole corpus

Alignment by the party a member sat for on the day, with 95% Wilson intervals. This is the test the measure could have failed.

PartyAligned95% CI n
PBP 82.5% 68–91% 40
LAB 78.2% 69–85% 101
IND 76.5% 72–81% 327
SF 75.8% 69–81% 198
SD 71.4% 58–82% 49
FG 69.1% 62–76% 162
FF 67.9% 60–75% 165
GP 56.8% 41–71% 37

Members of government parties align their stated position with their vote 9.4 points less often than Independents — bootstrap 95% CI [+2.7, +16.0], which excludes zero. Opposition parties sit 9.5 points above government too, CI [+3.1, +15.9]. Independents and opposition members are indistinguishable from each other (−0.0 points, CI [−6.3, +6.2]). So the gap does not come from having no party; it comes from being in government, which is what a whip effect should look like. Read this as the measure behaving sensibly, not as a finding about any individual.

How the scorer scores

Two automated methods were built and both failed. What survives is the rule-based layer, which is why the coverage above is narrow.

MethodAccuracy95% CI n
nli-vs-mover-anchor:deberta 35.9% 29–42% 234
nli-vs-mover-anchor:distilroberta 11.5% 8–16% 234

Zero-shot entailment was asked to judge contributions whose true position is known — the member moved the amendment, so the answer is support by construction — and got it right 11.5% of the time, returning "unclear" or "oppose" for nearly everything. A classifier trained on the rule-labelled cases over the corpus embeddings reached 71.1% against a 65.3% majority-class baseline: better than chance, not better enough. Both are excluded from every figure on this page. Only the rule-based cascade, which is exact where it fires and silent where it does not, is used.

Method

Position is read from the member's own contributions in the debate section the division belongs to, by a three-step cascade: an explicit move of the question ("I move amendment No. 5", true by construction); declarative stance phrases ordered so negations are tested first, because "I cannot support" and "I do not oppose" both defeat a naive keyword match; and, where neither fires, a zero-shot entailment model judging the contribution against the question put. Tone uses a separate model and is reported separately. Agreement against hand-labelled cases, with bootstrap intervals, is on the evidence page; no score here should be read without it.