◎ OireachtasDB

← Pippa Hackett

Rhetoric and votes

Pippa Hackett

Experimental measure. Read the method before quoting a number.
This compares the position a member expressed in a debate with the way they voted in the division that debate produced. It is not a measure of honesty. A member who argues against a Bill and then votes against it scores as aligned; so does one who never departs from a party line they also argue for. Voting against your own stated view under a party whip is ordinary parliamentary behaviour, which is why the whip breakdown below sits next to the headline rather than underneath it. Full method and validation →

Not yet computed for this member.

The alignment pipeline has not produced a score here. That is usually because this member never spoke in a debate section that went to a division with an attributable question — see the coverage table below.

Tone

Valence runs −1 (negative) to +1 (positive). This is a separate measure from alignment above and says nothing about how anyone voted — "the Minister has been asleep at the wheel" is strongly negative and carries no position on the question.

ModelSpeeches scored Mean valenceCorpus mean
vader336 +0.744 +0.423

Which policies move them

Mean tone by topic, most negative first. Topics come from an LDA model fitted over debate contributions; the terms are the model's, the labels are hand-assigned.

TopicSpeechesMean valence
Legislation, courts and legal process act · legislation · shall · court · person · information 30 +0.646
Procedural and rhetorical filler (low-content) important · like · good · debate · did · does 34 +0.794
Climate, agriculture, energy and water water · climate · farmers · energy · food · agriculture 79 +0.801
Media, banking and State companies ireland · irish · media · industry · companies · post 5 +0.857
Departmental programmes and funding (diffuse) department · national · funding · new · important · programme 62 +0.862
Transport, Dublin and rural development local · transport · dublin · city · public · community 7 +0.928
Children, families and young people children · women · young · child · family · families 5 +0.936

Departures from their own baseline

Contributions whose tone sits more than two standard deviations from this member's own average. Baselines are per member on purpose — an absolute threshold would just rank people by temperament.

2023-03-09 · Hedge Cutting · z = -4.5
An exemption under the legislation, which in the past allowed farmers to dispose of waste generated by agricultural practices by burning as a last resort, has been extended for a number of years. It was never intended that this exemption would be extended inde…

Full contribution →

2022-02-22 · An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business · z = -4.3 · Local government, roads and regional funding
Yesterday, Offaly County Council was pushed to provide safe houses for victims of domestic violence. It was asked to do so out of its housing allocation as a matter of urgency but the council's response was that it needed more time. I understand anyone's plea …

Full contribution →

2023-03-09 · Hedge Cutting · z = -3.9
This issue has been topical for a number of years. As the Deputy is aware, hedge trimming is a routine and essential management practice for farmers on their land. In light of this and in anticipation of the ending of the practice of burning as a method to dis…

Full contribution →

2022-04-27 · An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business · z = -3.9 · Justice, policing and defence
Members of the LGBT+ community have the right to feel safe and be safe in their homes, on our streets and online. Research by the Hate and Hostility Research Group, HHRG, at University of Limerick, identified that one in five of those surveyed had been punched…

Full contribution →

2020-11-10 · Dog Breeding Industry · z = -3.8 · Media, banking and State companies
Ultimately, responsibility lies not only with the people selling the pets to provide the information required, as was indicated by the Senator, but also on the publishers of the advertisements. They are required to ensure that people display the information. U…

Full contribution →

2020-09-30 · Forestry (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2020 [Seanad]: Committee and Remaining Stages · z = -3.7 · Legislation, courts and legal process
As I mentioned earlier, many of these amendments are duplicates of those that were tabled in the Seanad last week. I am disappointed we are not getting an opportunity to debate them fully and in time. If Deputy Cairns is concerned about one particular amendmen…

Full contribution →

2022-02-15 · Farm Costs · z = -3.7
Not at all. The Deputy is wrong. It is to enable farmers to become sustainable so that their farms are sustainable for future generations. The current model does not work. We cannot leave farmers at a loose end with no fertiliser. We need to support farmers to…

Full contribution →

2020-09-25 · Forestry (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2020: Committee and Remaining Stages · z = -3.3
It is entirely appropriate that the forestry appeals committee should be satisfied whether a serious or significant error, or a series of errors, was made in making the decision that is the subject of the appeal. I will not be accepting the amendment.…

Full contribution →

2022-02-15 · Farm Costs · z = -2.9
If the Deputy has been following any of the current affairs, he will be aware of that. Fertiliser is essentially made from gas. If the gas prices go up, the fertiliser price goes up. I cannot be much clear than that.…

Full contribution →

2020-09-15 · Afforestation Programme · z = -2.7
I am looking forward to that visit very much. I was aware of the destruction of many hundreds of thousands of young trees, which was an absolute travesty really. I hope that is not something we will see repeated. Nurseries need a significant run-in time and to…

Full contribution →

2022-03-09 · An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business · z = -2.4 · Climate, agriculture, energy and water
I need to speak doubly quick now or I will run out of time. Our economic system is having detrimental impacts on our planet. While the current crisis in Ukraine is first and foremost a humanitarian crisis and we cannot and must not lose sight of that reality, …

Full contribution →

2020-09-30 · Forestry (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2020 [Seanad]: Committee and Remaining Stages · z = -2.4 · Legislation, courts and legal process
I will discuss all of the amendments in one group. Some of these amendments relate to a timeframe. The need to issue decisions in a timely manner is the precise reason I am introducing these regulations. It is not appropriate to put into the Bill a time limit …

Full contribution →

The whip, across the whole corpus

Alignment by the party a member sat for on the day, with 95% Wilson intervals. This is the test the measure could have failed.

PartyAligned95% CI n
PBP 82.5% 68–91% 40
LAB 78.2% 69–85% 101
IND 76.5% 72–81% 327
SF 75.8% 69–81% 198
SD 71.4% 58–82% 49
FG 69.1% 62–76% 162
FF 67.9% 60–75% 165
GP 56.8% 41–71% 37

Members of government parties align their stated position with their vote 9.4 points less often than Independents — bootstrap 95% CI [+2.7, +16.0], which excludes zero. Opposition parties sit 9.5 points above government too, CI [+3.1, +15.9]. Independents and opposition members are indistinguishable from each other (−0.0 points, CI [−6.3, +6.2]). So the gap does not come from having no party; it comes from being in government, which is what a whip effect should look like. Read this as the measure behaving sensibly, not as a finding about any individual.

How the scorer scores

Two automated methods were built and both failed. What survives is the rule-based layer, which is why the coverage above is narrow.

MethodAccuracy95% CI n
nli-vs-mover-anchor:deberta 35.9% 29–42% 234
nli-vs-mover-anchor:distilroberta 11.5% 8–16% 234

Zero-shot entailment was asked to judge contributions whose true position is known — the member moved the amendment, so the answer is support by construction — and got it right 11.5% of the time, returning "unclear" or "oppose" for nearly everything. A classifier trained on the rule-labelled cases over the corpus embeddings reached 71.1% against a 65.3% majority-class baseline: better than chance, not better enough. Both are excluded from every figure on this page. Only the rule-based cascade, which is exact where it fires and silent where it does not, is used.

Method

Position is read from the member's own contributions in the debate section the division belongs to, by a three-step cascade: an explicit move of the question ("I move amendment No. 5", true by construction); declarative stance phrases ordered so negations are tested first, because "I cannot support" and "I do not oppose" both defeat a naive keyword match; and, where neither fires, a zero-shot entailment model judging the contribution against the question put. Tone uses a separate model and is reported separately. Agreement against hand-labelled cases, with bootstrap intervals, is on the evidence page; no score here should be read without it.