Not the corporate donations. It is the donations in kind.
On prevailing side: this member voted with the winning side in 82 of 671 decisive votes (8 abstentions excluded). Read it as a government-or-opposition indicator rather than a measure of influence — the figure is near 100% for members supporting the government of the day and near 0% for those opposing it.
This is the point of the site: contributions keep the party held on the day, not the one held now.
| Party | Recorded as | Contributions | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| SD | Social Democrats | 1,282 | 2020-02-20 – 2024-11-07 |
Membership spells on record: LAB 1992-11-25–1997-05-15 · LAB 1997-06-06–2002-04-25 · LAB 2002-05-17–2007-04-30 · LAB 2007-05-24–2011-02-01 · LAB 2011-02-25–2012-09-26 · IND 2012-09-26–2015-07-15 · SD 2015-07-15–2016-03-09 · SD 2016-03-10–2020-01-14 · SD 2020-02-08–2024-11-08
Not the corporate donations. It is the donations in kind.
What about the other aspects-----
-----in terms of the people who were employed?
I made the point last week that what the Minister is doing and the explanation he is providing for these various figures sound very much like reverse engineering to suit the rules. That is not the case in relation to donations that, as I have already said, are goods and services that have commercial value, which must be declared donations. The Minister seems to be suggesting these were not donations. Mr. Stone putting up the posters for the Minister, paying people to put up the posters and providing the vans were a…
Is that correct?
No.
The Minister is using expenses and donations-----
I am not talking-----
I ask the Ceann Comhairle to just bear with me for a couple of moments. I am not talking about the corporate donation. I am talking about the donations in kind that the Minister got with people being paid to put up his posters and for the provision of vans. The Minister last week said, as I understand it, that they were actually donations to the party, so how did the Minister-----
No. I am looking for an answer to this question.
How did the Minister relay that information to the party that they were donations to the party?
Did the Minister, as he was required to do, get an acknowledgement-----
-----of that donation? Under the guidelines the Minister is required to get an acknowledgement from the party if he is saying that the donations went to the party.
The Minister is pleading ignorance.
It is in the general election guidelines.
Did the Minister get an acknowledgement of that?
These are the guidelines for the election.
I welcome what can only be described as long overdue legislation, which we in the Social Democrats are happy to support. This is an area very much in need of reform and tighter regulation. It is by no means a new issue. The first of four rounds of public consultation took place as far back as 2007. The first iteration of this Bill was published in 2009. It is frankly unacceptable that it has taken well over a decade for this legislation to reach the House. What was the hold-up? It is hard to understand when there i…
I join others in congratulating the Minister on his new role. I wish him well and look forward to working with him. I also extend best wishes to the Minister of State, Deputy Carroll MacNeill, in her promotion. I hope she has a fruitful career in the Department of Finance. My question relates to choices that were made at budget time whereby a very substantial tax package benefited a small minority of taxpayers. A huge number of taxpayers did not get any benefit from it. That was a political choice the Government ma…
I wish to ask the Minister about the repercussions of that.