I will simply reply by saying that I am responding to particular things that Senator Ward chose to say.
On prevailing side: this member voted with the winning side in 25 of 177 decisive votes (0 abstentions excluded). Read it as a government-or-opposition indicator rather than a measure of influence — the figure is near 100% for members supporting the government of the day and near 0% for those opposing it.
This is the point of the site: contributions keep the party held on the day, not the one held now.
| Party | Recorded as | Contributions | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| IND | Independent | 1,687 | 2020-01-21 – 2026-09-23 |
Membership spells on record: IND 2007-07-23–2011-04-25 · IND 2011-05-25–2016-04-24 · IND 2016-03-10–2020-03-29 · IND 2020-03-30–2025-01-29 · IND 2025-01-29–present
I will simply reply by saying that I am responding to particular things that Senator Ward chose to say.
If he chose to say them and it was in order, then it is in order for me to reply at this point. I will conclude by saying that everything that is being proposed here today leaves open the possibility that people will be protected against crimes based on hateful motivation. I will put it to the Senators again - we are here in this House as politicians - that if someone is attacked because they are a child of a political family, and that has a chilling effect on them ever getting involved in politics, that is serious…
They are real crimes.
No, they are protected. Of course they are protected under criminal law.
That is a misrepresentation. I want them all to be protected.
Not true. Has the Minister read my amendments?
Has the Minister read my amendments?
She has not internalised them.
Check out amendment No. 100.
Not true.
On a point of order-----
The Minister has said something that is untrue. I ask her, given that we are talking about the Government and its responsibilities regarding truthfulness, to take a pause and read amendment No. 100. I ask her to withdraw the assertion that there is nothing in my amendment and indeed those of others that would protect a transgender person.
And mine?
Has the Minister even read my amendment?
There is no heckling. We are asking for basic respect.
Disagree with me if you will, but do not misrepresent-----
Lots of people believe that.
They would be new to most people.
Exactly.
Senator Higgins warned against creating fear around the existence of transgender people. I think that is a concern that everybody can share. Everybody should be against any creation of fear around transgender people. Senator McDowell, who spoke eloquently, put his finger on it when he said that the important word is "empathic". There is a different thing when we talk about the activity of trans activists and the implications of that activity for child protection, in particular, and for the protection of women's saf…