◎ OireachtasDB

← Simon Coveney

Rhetoric and votes

Simon Coveney

Experimental measure. Read the method before quoting a number.
This compares the position a member expressed in a debate with the way they voted in the division that debate produced. It is not a measure of honesty. A member who argues against a Bill and then votes against it scores as aligned; so does one who never departs from a party line they also argue for. Voting against your own stated view under a party whip is ordinary parliamentary behaviour, which is why the whip breakdown below sits next to the headline rather than underneath it. Full method and validation →
—
only 1 scorable vote — below the 10 needed for an interval worth printing
100%
voted with their own party's majority · 504 votes

Why the denominator is small

The measure only exists where this member actually spoke in the debate their vote belongs to, and where that vote can be tied to a specific question. Both cuts are steep.

Votes cast506
… spoke in that debate section14
… vote tied to a specific question13
… position stated clearly enough to score1

The third row is the sharpest cut. A committee-stage sitting can hold fifteen divisions while its speeches discuss forty-two numbered amendments, and the record does not say which amendment each division was. Those votes are counted here and deliberately left unscored rather than guessed.

Alignment against the whip

The same scorable votes, split by whether the member went with their party. The top-right cell is the one worth reading: a stated position reversed while following the party line.

Voted with own partyVoted against own party
Matched their words 1 0
Contradicted their words 0 0

Not scored: 1 where the vote could not be tied to a question, 1 where no clear position was stated in the debate.

Tone

Valence runs −1 (negative) to +1 (positive). This is a separate measure from alignment above and says nothing about how anyone voted — "the Minister has been asleep at the wheel" is strongly negative and carries no position on the question.

ModelSpeeches scored Mean valenceCorpus mean
vader1,383 +0.623 +0.423

Which policies move them

Mean tone by topic, most negative first. Topics come from an LDA model fitted over debate contributions; the terms are the model's, the labels are hand-assigned.

TopicSpeechesMean valence
Health services, HSE and disability health · services · care · service · hse · mental 6 +0.278
Party-political exchange (party names dominate) workers · rights · right · sinn · féin · irish 5 +0.281
War, Ukraine, Israel and human rights international · ireland · ukraine · israel · war · irish 54 +0.459
Legislation, courts and legal process act · legislation · shall · court · person · information 30 +0.495
Procedural and rhetorical filler (low-content) important · like · good · debate · did · does 61 +0.667
Cost of living, tax and budget cost · tax · budget · energy · costs · increase 5 +0.723
Justice, policing and defence garda · defence · justice · violence · criminal · gardaí 24 +0.758
Covid-19 and public health emergency covid · health · public · pandemic · measures · safety 19 +0.799
EU and international relations ireland · european · irish · union · europe · countries 98 +0.816
Departmental programmes and funding (diffuse) department · national · funding · new · important · programme 36 +0.816

Departures from their own baseline

Contributions whose tone sits more than two standard deviations from this member's own average. Baselines are per member on purpose — an absolute threshold would just rank people by temperament.

2021-05-11 · Foreign Conflicts · z = -3.5
I am deeply concerned by the escalation of violence in Jerusalem in recent days, the launching of rockets from Gaza and the actions of the Israeli defence forces. Many were shocked at reports of 24 Palestinians being killed last night, including nine children.…

Full contribution →

2022-11-22 · Ukraine War · z = -3.5
This is an horrific war. We may have seen up to 250,000 people killed already, and perhaps 200,000 of those have been military personnel on both sides. It is hard to know what the figure is in respect of civilian losses, but it could be anything between 40,000…

Full contribution →

2022-10-06 · Diplomatic Representation · z = -3.5
I answered this question earlier. It is useful to have a channel of communication that allows us to communicate in no uncertain terms what we think of Russia's position on Ukraine and its aggression and invasion of a sovereign neighbour. We called the Russian …

Full contribution →

2021-06-24 · International Relations · z = -3.5
It is helpful to put some facts on the record, or certainly as they are understood. Food insecurity continues to be of serious concern. Over 5.2 million people are in need of emergency food aid right now. Alarmingly, the United Nations Office for the Coordinat…

Full contribution →

2022-11-22 · Human Rights · z = -3.5
I was concerned at what we were all seeing on our phones and television screens about what was unfolding in Iran, so I requested the Iranian ambassador to come in to explain what was going on in his country and to express my concern and condemnation for what I…

Full contribution →

2021-10-05 · An tOrd Gnó - Order of Business · z = -3.5
The French finance minister can say whatever he wants but our Government has not had a recommendation yet as the basis for a decision. With regard to Deputy Collins' question, I have met many of the families who were deeply impacted by the Whiddy Island disast…

Full contribution →

2022-05-10 · Human Rights · z = -3.4
I have just told the Deputy about a range of things we have been doing in terms of raising the matter. However, Ireland does not control the foreign policy decisions of other countries. We try to make arguments that can build consensus around international act…

Full contribution →

2020-06-03 · Covid-19 (Foreign Affairs and Trade): Statements · z = -3.4 · War, Ukraine, Israel and human rights
I think it is pretty clear where the Irish people stand on this issue. I speak to the ambassador, Mr. Crawford, quite regularly. I do not have a scheduled call with him, but I would not be surprised if I were to speak to him in the next week or so. What Irish …

Full contribution →

2022-05-10 · International Sanctions · z = -3.4
My focus is to do everything we can as a country and as a member of the European Union to bring this war to an end and to promote democracy in Belarus to ensure that the people there get the government and the president they elect, as opposed to skewed electio…

Full contribution →

2022-03-10 · Departmental Expenditure · z = -3.4
As the Deputy knows, Ireland does not decide on arms embargoes. The trade policy of the European Union is decided collectively. It is proposed by the Commission and debated by member states. We had a very good debate on the Amnesty International report in this…

Full contribution →

2021-11-18 · Foreign Policy · z = -3.3
There has been a steep deterioration in the situation in Belarus since Alexander Lukashenko’s fraudulent re-election as president in August 2020. Tens of thousands of Belarusians protested in response, calling for fair elections, justice and a better future. T…

Full contribution →

2020-03-27 · Emergency Measures in the Public Interest (Covid-19) Bill 2020: Committee and Remaining Stages · z = -3.3 · Legislation, courts and legal process
We are dealing with two slightly separate issues. First is the concern that Senators understandably have that one person is simply making decisions about patients without any other input. That is not what is being proposed. The note I have regards clinical inp…

Full contribution →

The whip, across the whole corpus

Alignment by the party a member sat for on the day, with 95% Wilson intervals. This is the test the measure could have failed.

PartyAligned95% CI n
PBP 82.5% 68–91% 40
LAB 78.2% 69–85% 101
IND 76.5% 72–81% 327
SF 75.8% 69–81% 198
SD 71.4% 58–82% 49
FG 69.1% 62–76% 162
FF 67.9% 60–75% 165
GP 56.8% 41–71% 37

Members of government parties align their stated position with their vote 9.4 points less often than Independents — bootstrap 95% CI [+2.7, +16.0], which excludes zero. Opposition parties sit 9.5 points above government too, CI [+3.1, +15.9]. Independents and opposition members are indistinguishable from each other (−0.0 points, CI [−6.3, +6.2]). So the gap does not come from having no party; it comes from being in government, which is what a whip effect should look like. Read this as the measure behaving sensibly, not as a finding about any individual.

How the scorer scores

Two automated methods were built and both failed. What survives is the rule-based layer, which is why the coverage above is narrow.

MethodAccuracy95% CI n
nli-vs-mover-anchor:deberta 35.9% 29–42% 234
nli-vs-mover-anchor:distilroberta 11.5% 8–16% 234

Zero-shot entailment was asked to judge contributions whose true position is known — the member moved the amendment, so the answer is support by construction — and got it right 11.5% of the time, returning "unclear" or "oppose" for nearly everything. A classifier trained on the rule-labelled cases over the corpus embeddings reached 71.1% against a 65.3% majority-class baseline: better than chance, not better enough. Both are excluded from every figure on this page. Only the rule-based cascade, which is exact where it fires and silent where it does not, is used.

Method

Position is read from the member's own contributions in the debate section the division belongs to, by a three-step cascade: an explicit move of the question ("I move amendment No. 5", true by construction); declarative stance phrases ordered so negations are tested first, because "I cannot support" and "I do not oppose" both defeat a naive keyword match; and, where neither fires, a zero-shot entailment model judging the contribution against the question put. Tone uses a separate model and is reported separately. Agreement against hand-labelled cases, with bootstrap intervals, is on the evidence page; no score here should be read without it.