It must be relevant to the amendment.
On prevailing side: this member voted with the winning side in 172 of 425 decisive votes (10 abstentions excluded). Read it as a government-or-opposition indicator rather than a measure of influence — the figure is near 100% for members supporting the government of the day and near 0% for those opposing it.
This is the point of the site: contributions keep the party held on the day, not the one held now.
| Party | Recorded as | Contributions | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC | Ceann Comhairle / Chair | 5,548 | 2022-04-07 – 2026-10-01 |
| IND | Independent | 825 | 2020-03-05 – 2026-06-09 |
Membership spells on record: IND 2020-02-08–2024-11-08 · IND 2024-11-29–present
It must be relevant to the amendment.
Are there any further Members? If it is relevant, Deputy Ó Súilleabháin.
It is not relevant, Deputy, because deportation is not mentioned in the amendment.
I am afraid it is not. It is not relevant to this amendment.
It may be relevant to the other amendments but we are sticking to the amendments. I call Deputy Gannon.
Amendment No. 6 has been ruled out of order.
It has been explained, Deputy. It carries a potential charge on revenue and unless he can dispel that, I am afraid it is out of order.
I will read the note for the Deputy. It states: "Amendment No. 6 would insert a new definition for legal counselling, a term used later in the Bill, but this definition would provide that such services be provided to persons without charge to the applicant, irrespective of a person's ability to secure legal services by their own means." Unfortunately, that is where the money message comes in. It has been checked.
The reason that amendment No. 6 is ruled out of order is that at paragraph (c), it states, "without charge to the applicant". Amendment No. 7 is somewhat more nuanced or ambiguous.
Relevance, Deputy.
I will clarify again the reasoning behind the ruling out of order of Deputy Gannon's amendment. Deputy Kelly clearly did not get that part (c) of Deputy Gannon's-----
No, I think it is important for-----
No, I am explaining because Deputy Kelly said that he cannot understand.
For the benefit of new Members, Deputy Gannon's amendment expressly states "without charge to the applicant", which means that it creates a money message.
We can get to that, absolutely. I have explained the reason. There is no such expression in amendment No. 7, in the name of Deputy Carthy.
Does the Minister wish to respond?
Amendment No. 9 in the name of Deputy Alan Kelly has been ruled out of order.
I am just about to read the reason. I thank the Deputy. Amendment No. 9 would insert a new definition for "legal counselling", a term used later in the Bill. This definition would provide that such services would be provided to persons free of charge irrespective of a person's ability to secure legal services by their own means. Amendment No. 47 in the name of Deputy Kelly forms a composite proposal with amendment No. 9, inserting a reference to these "legal counselling" services into section 26 of the Bill. Such "…
The Deputy will accept, however, that the Bills Office must operate under Standing Orders.
I thank the Deputy.