◎ OireachtasDB

Dail Éireann · 2023-04-25

Legal Aid (Amendment) Bill 2023: First Stage

GP Patrick Costello · Dublin South-Central

Party shown is the one held on 2023-04-25, frozen at parse time — not the speaker's party today.

Summary of this debate

Auto-generated

I move: That leave be granted to introduce a Bill entitled an Act to amend the Civil Legal Aid Act 1995, and to provide for a more effective legal aid system. Almost every speaker on the Bill referred to a functioning justice system being a key part of democracy, as well as the need for a justice system that is independent and accessible. We must look at civil legal aid and the issue of the accessibility of justice and supports for those who cannot afford to access the system.

Justice Henchy described a criminal legal aid certificate as a shield for citizens to ensure their constitutional due. It is simply unfair and undemocratic not to provide that same shield when it comes to civil legal aid and civil law matters.

Built by scoring every sentence in the debate on how distinctive its language is, then quoting the highest-scoring ones back word for word and in the order spoken. Nothing is paraphrased or invented — if a sentence appears here, it was said in the chamber. Drawn from 212 words across 5 contributions by 3 speakers.

Most used terms in this debate

How often each word appears across the whole debate, ranked by how distinctive it is to this debate rather than common to all parliamentary language.

aid 7
justice 9
bill 9
civil 6
legal 7
democracy 4
system 7
judicial 3
shield 2
members' 3
accessible 3
judges 2

The full debate

All 5 contributions, start to finish, in the order they were made. The one you came here for is highlighted.

GP Patrick Costello

I move:

That leave be granted to introduce a Bill entitled an Act to amend the Civil Legal Aid Act 1995, and to provide for a more effective legal aid system.

Before I address the Bill, as this is my first chance to speak in the House today other than on the Order of Business, I wish to mark Armenian Genocide Memorial Day, which was observed yesterday. In light of the continued threats to and invasion of Armenia by its neighbours, it is important that we mark and remember that day.

Last week, the House discussed the Courts Bill 2023, which seeks to provide more judges for the courts system. Almost every speaker on the Bill referred to a functioning justice system being a key part of democracy, as well as the need for a justice system that is independent and accessible. The latter point is the important bit here. Justice must be accessible. As the Chief Justice stated, accessibility to justice is not just about judges and courtrooms. We must look at civil legal aid and the issue of the accessibility of justice and supports for those who cannot afford to access the system. The reality is that many who cannot afford the system are simply locked out of it. In a landmark case relating to criminal legal aid, Mr. Justice Henchy described a criminal legal aid certificate as a shield for citizens to ensure their constitutional due. It is simply unfair and undemocratic not to provide that same shield when it comes to civil legal aid and civil law matters.

There have been many recent comments in respect of judicial review, which is an essential part of the civil law and democracy. Comments that try to degrade and disdain judicial review and those who provide services relating to judicial review are disdainful of the justice system as a whole, as well as of democracy.

The Bill is a simple one. It sets out expanded criteria under which civil legal aid can be obtained and provides for changes in respect of financial eligibility and individual contributions. The aim of the Bill is to ensure justice is accessible for all and that is ultimately about supporting democracy.

CC Catherine Connolly

Is the Bill opposed?

FG Hildegarde Naughton

No.

CC Catherine Connolly

Since this is a Private Members' Bill, Second Stage must, under Standing Orders, be taken in Private Members' time.

GP Patrick Costello this contribution

I move: "That the Bill be taken in Private Members' time."