◎ OireachtasDB

Dail Éireann · 2023-12-13

Teachtaireacht ón Uachtarán - Message from President

CC Seán Ó Fearghaíl · Kildare South

Party shown is the one held on 2023-12-13, frozen at parse time — not the speaker's party today.

Summary of this debate

Auto-generated

For the information of Members, I wish to advise that I received a message from the President stating that pursuant to Article 26 of the Constitution and after consultation with the Council of State, he had referred sections 9, 10, 39, 40(2), 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 51, 57 and 58 of the Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2022 to the Supreme Court for a decision on the question as to whether the said sections of the Bill were repugnant to the Constitution, or any provision thereof. I subsequently received a message from the President informing me that the Supreme Court had decided that sections 9, 10, 39, 40(2), 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 51, 57 and 58 of the Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2022 were not repugnant to the Constitution or to any provision thereof, and that he had accordingly signed the Bill on 8 December 2023.

Built by scoring every sentence in the debate on how distinctive its language is, then quoting the highest-scoring ones back word for word and in the order spoken. Nothing is paraphrased or invented — if a sentence appears here, it was said in the chamber. Drawn from 147 words across 1 contributions by 1 speakers.

Most used terms in this debate

How often each word appears across the whole debate, ranked by how distinctive it is to this debate rather than common to all parliamentary language.

repugnant 2
constitution 3
sections 3
thereof 2
supreme 2
bill 4
judicial 2
appointments 2
president 2
message 2
court 2
commission 2

The full debate

All 1 contribution, start to finish, in the order they were made. The one you came here for is highlighted.

CC Seán Ó Fearghaíl this contribution

For the information of Members, I wish to advise that I received a message from the President stating that pursuant to Article 26 of the Constitution and after consultation with the Council of State, he had referred sections 9, 10, 39, 40(2), 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 51, 57 and 58 of the Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2022 to the Supreme Court for a decision on the question as to whether the said sections of the Bill were repugnant to the Constitution, or any provision thereof.

I subsequently received a message from the President informing me that the Supreme Court had decided that sections 9, 10, 39, 40(2), 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 51, 57 and 58 of the Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2022 were not repugnant to the Constitution or to any provision thereof, and that he had accordingly signed the Bill on 8 December 2023.