I welcome the crew from Waterford who are guests of Senator Clifford-Lee. It is not every day we talk about biodiversity and animals, so they have picked a good day to come in. I welcome Ted and Mary, all the way from Cork. Every time I am in this Chamber, their daughter is in here so either she loves giving me a hard time or she is one of the hardest-working Senators in the Seanad. The second one is probably true - maybe both. Senator Joe Conway gave a fantastic impression of a collared dove. It is not every day I see someone try to mimic a collared dove in Seanad Éireann, so we are making progress.
Let me begin by thanking Senators Noonan, Stephenson, Harmon and Cosgrove for tabling this Private Members’ motion in the Seanad for debate today, which will not be opposed by the Government. As I understand it, the principle underpinning the motion is to provide sustainable, long-term support for the work of wildlife rehabilitation centres, using both revenue derived from fines imposed for wildlife crime and additional Exchequer funding.
I and my colleagues in government are keenly aware that Ireland is home to incredibly dedicated individuals whose tireless care for injured animals is commendable. I thank them for that. These wildlife rehabilitation centres complement our conservation efforts, providing meaningful support to the National Parks and Wildlife Service of my Department in protecting our native species. I am grateful for the work they do to heal injured wildlife. In that spirit, the Government will not be opposing the motion. It should be noted, however, that there are some practical difficulties with it.
The proposal that a wildlife rescue support scheme would be established partly from fines imposed for wildlife crime in the courts would need further consideration as currently, fines on convictions are paid directly to the Courts Service of Ireland which, ultimately, go to the State. Furthermore, in such wildlife crime cases, moneys in the form of donations are also, on occasion, made to wildlife charities but this appears to be at the discretion of the particular judge at that particular time. There would also be ramifications from a budget perspective, which would have to be examined by the Government with regard to approval and allocation of Exchequer moneys.
Animal welfare is a key priority for the Government. Neglect of or causing unnecessary suffering to animals is not acceptable in our society. To this end, the programme for Government provides a commitment to the continued robust enforcement of the Animal Health and Welfare Act 2013, which provides a modern framework for regulating and applying standards in the area of animal health and welfare. This Act applies to domesticated animals and livestock as well as wildlife in specific scenarios, such as preventing unnecessary suffering or controlling diseases. It obliges anyone who has an animal in their possession or control to safeguard the animal’s health and welfare.
The Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine has lead policy responsibility within government for animal welfare and that Department already provides support to eligible animal welfare charities to assist them in their vital work in rescuing and rehoming domestic and farm animals through its animal welfare grants programme. Through this programme, funding of almost €6 million was awarded in 2023 and 2024 to over 100 animal welfare charities throughout the country. In 2025, this was increased to almost €6.5 million awarded to such charities, which includes those specifically involved in the care of wildlife. Last year, for example, Galway and Claddagh Swan Rescue received grant funding of €14,800; Wildlife Rescue Cork received €12,000; the Irish Whale and Dolphin Group received €10,000; and Seal Rescue Ireland received €36,000. Separately, the work of rehabilitation centres can be supported through other grant means too. For example, the heritage organisation support fund is a grant scheme administered by the Heritage Council, which aims to build the capacity of non-governmental organisations working in the heritage sector by providing grants of up to €50,000 towards their core costs. Interest in the scheme continues to grow year on year and funding for the scheme has also continued to increase. In 2026, the Heritage Council has allocated €1.8 million to the programme and this has included organisations like Kildare Wildlife Rescue, which received €50,000 this year and the same amount last year. The funding will support core staffing across wildlife care, volunteer co-ordination and training and engagement. The approved work plan will strengthen organisational capacity, support the rescue and rehabilitation of an estimated 5,000 to 6,000 animals nationwide, expand professional training programmes and further develop public engagement through seminars, workshops and a national biodiversity conference, thereby contributing to biodiversity protection and community stewardship of natural heritage.
At its core, the National Parks and Wildlife Service safeguards nature through a robust combination of regulatory oversight, compliance monitoring and enforcement activity. It is the primary body ensuring that all interventions in our natural world, including independent wildlife rehabilitation, are conducted legally and safely. It is important to clarify the remit of the NPWS. As a conservation body, the regulatory focus is primarily on the survival of species in the wild rather than individual animal welfare cases unless a crime has been committed.
While wildlife rehabilitation centres focus on the recovery of individual animals, their work fits into the larger picture managed by the NPWS, which oversees the protection of our entire natural heritage. I note the motion recognises the need for those involved in wildlife rehabilitation to be licensed, experienced and accountable. Any increased professionalism in the wildlife sector is to be commended due to the importance of acting in the best interests of our wildlife population. Under its remit, the NPWS has a regulatory role in relation to wildlife rescue centres as it oversees mandatory licensing requirements for individuals seeking to possess protected wild birds and animals for the purposes of rehabilitation and release under the Wildlife Act 1976. Conditions are attached to such licences to ensure the protection of wildlife and inspections of facilities occur on an annual basis, where resources allow. It also supports wildlife rehabilitation through a structured framework of specialised species projects. By ensuring these standards are met, the biological integrity of our wild populations is protected.
With Ireland's 4th National Biodiversity Action Plan 2023-2030, NBAP, and the Wildlife (Amendment) Act, the work of NPWS now has a statutory backbone. This is reinforced by the EU nature restoration regulation, which challenges us to restore 20% of our land and sea by 2030. Today, I will demonstrate how the NPWS is meeting this ambition through a combination of rigorous regulation, innovative species projects and strategic community partnerships.
In our coastal strongholds for corncrake, the NPWS has spearheaded a recovery of corncrake populations through the corncrake or traonach conservation programme, a continuation of the corncrake grant scheme, and this is led by the Corncrake LIFE project. Population targets set by the Corncrake LIFE project back in 2021 have been surpassed, with a population increase of 50% by 2025, far exceeding the original project ambitions of a 20% increase for that period. Looking to securing the future of the corncrake in the west and north west, the NPWS is now contracting support under the Natura communities for birds initiative to ensure continuity after Corncrake LIFE, using existing frameworks of support and community-led programmes of delivery for corncrakes and other farmland birds, with an annual budget of €1.45 million per year. The NPWS has played an important role, along with the Irish Grey Partridge Conservation Trust, in the conservation of the grey partridge in Ireland. Our work at Lough Boora involves restoring habitats for grey partridge by providing suitable habitats like beetle banks and nesting strips, not just saving a game bird, but using it as an umbrella species to lift the biodiversity of the entire landscape.
Similarly, LIFE on Machair is protecting the globally rare coastal habitats systems of the west of Ireland, supporting 259 pairs of breeding waders and rare pollinators like the great yellow bumblebee. We are proving that traditional agriculture and high-level conservation are not just compatible - they are co-dependent. In Wexford, to ensure the protection of breeding seabirds on the Great Saltee Island, part of the Saltee Islands special protection area and a world-class seabird colony holding an impressive ten seabird species of conservation interest, the NPWS has appointed wardens to engage with and educate visitors on the importance of the island and help reduce disturbance from visitor numbers.
Through the local biodiversity action fund and in conjunction with Fingal County Council, the NPWS provides the vital funding for NGO-led wardening of Ireland’s Eye in Dublin. Protection also means rolling out conservation measures to improve the physical security of vulnerable populations, such as predator exclusion fencing, from the breeding wader sites of County Donegal to protect lapwing and curlew, to the little tern colonies in Portrane. These fences are often the thin line between a successful breeding season and total colony failure.
Our Hen Harrier Threat Response Plan 2024-2028 co-ordinates 60-plus actions with the aim of supporting a population recovery of hen harriers in Ireland. We are tackling pressures across the forestry, agriculture and energy sectors to help to move the species toward favourable status.
Earlier today, I launched the independent advisory committee report, Recommendations to inform the development and implementation of Ireland’s national Nature Restoration Plan. The report, which includes 46 policy recommendations and 48 article-specific recommendations, represents the culmination of 15 months of work by the committee, which was established in late 2024 to advise me on the preparation of Ireland's national nature restoration plan, a requirement under the EU nature restoration law. It comprises seven general recommendations aimed at ensuring a successful implementation of the forthcoming plan, including three priority recommendations, which are funding nature restoration, prioritising action on public lands, and supporting farmers, fishermen and foresters. In addition, the report provides an analysis of Articles 4 to 13 of the EU nature restoration law, which sets out legally binding targets to restore a wide range of ecosystems and species in EU member states. Ireland is by far the most advanced EU nation in putting together our nature restoration plan, demonstrating the priority that we hold for nature restoration.
The independent advisory committee's work was informed by parallel public and stakeholder engagement processes that heard from more than 1,000 people across the country through deliberative democracy-style leaders forums and local, participatory community conversations. I reiterate that together with my colleagues across government, I am committed to ensuring that the committee's recommendations are delivered on through Ireland's national nature restoration plan and that the people of Ireland, no matter where they come from, can see and feel the benefits of restored and thriving nature for themselves. The NPWS provides the science, the regulation and the funding, but the success of the national restoration plan depends on the farmers, the wardens and the local communities who share our vision. We are no longer just documenting decline; we are leading the recovery. We are ensuring that Ireland's unique species remain a permanent, thriving part of our natural heritage.
I welcome the motion. There is absolutely no dispute. The role that wildlife rescue centres play across Ireland is vital. They protect wild species which, as we have already outlined, are under severe threat, so we want to support that. We need wildlife rescue centres in existence. We need the dedicated personnel who work and volunteer there. Without them, wildlife in Ireland would be in a much poorer place. I will and have given a commitment to visit Kildare Wildlife Rescue in the coming months to see first-hand the extraordinary work it is doing. I welcome many of the comments around nature restoration, habitat protection and species in general, because even though we have to support our wildlife rescue centres, I really fundamentally believe, especially after today, when we launch the recommendations from the new independent advisory committee on nature restoration, that our focus has to be on bringing Ireland, the species within Ireland, and our habitats back from the brink. It is really bleak out there. The habitats are in a bad condition. Our species are declining at a rapid rate. We can do more and better. The nature restoration plan provides us with the opportunity to do that. I would love to see as much focus and funding as possible going to nature restoration, restoring those habitats, creating healthy ecosystems, and getting rid of the invasive species that are an absolute blight on our countryside and impacting our native species. That is where we need to put our focus and funding, because those measures, above all else, will see those beautiful species that we all hold so dear come back from the brink.
I am glad to see education mentioned in this as well, because that is another area of focus that we have not spent enough effort, time or resources highlighting. We need people to become ecologically literate. Young kids in particular are obsessed with wildlife. They could tell you the nerdiest facts on whales, dolphins, polar bears and exotic chameleons that live in Papua New Guinea, but do they know what a healthy ecosystem in Ireland looks like? That is where I would like to see the focus and funding going, instead of Sitka spruce going out to schools, as Senators will be well aware. It also helps the work of those wildlife rescue centres. We are in the middle of breeding season now. There are ground-nesting birds and an issue where people are letting their dogs off leashes. I guarantee that many of the referrals to wildlife rescue centres are because of damage that has been done by dogs in sensitive areas where they have been let off leashes. On a lighting policy, I also imagine that wildlife rescue centres will get things like Manx shearwater, seabirds and gannets brought into their care, because there is a ridiculous lighting policy along our coast where these birds are attracted in and become injured and vulnerable.
I commend the Senator on the motion. There is no doubt about that. I would love to see a lot more time in the Seanad dedicated to a Private Member's motion on habitat restoration and how we can protect the most vulnerable species, which are threatened with extinction and in decline. That is not to take away from the work that wildlife rescue centres do. They are extraordinary. I really feel that cross-party, cross-Government and cross-Opposition, we need a whole Oireachtas approach to support the upcoming nature restoration plan, to ensure it is funded and to ensure we use it as the best opportunity that we have ever had in the State to turn the tide on nature loss in Ireland.