I raise the topic of online safety and the regulation of social media platforms, which is a very topical issue given the EU KIDS Act, which we have been slowly learning about over the course of this week, as well as the focus on it during Ursula von der Leyen's state of the Union address just yesterday and the online safety conference run by the Minister of State's Department last week.
I will start by talking about what we are trying to make safe and what the harms are. Across my constituency, including Dundrum, Stillorgan, Foxrock and Goatstown, and across the entire country, we are being contacted as representatives by parents who are at their wits' end trying to figure out how to manage this. They are so concerned at the dangers they see. When we design solutions to regulate these tech platforms to mitigate online harms, we have to think of what those harms are to find the right solutions. The first category is mental health concerns. Primary among them is the addictive nature of these products, what it means for all of us and what it is doing to our brains. There are also issues around self-harm being promoted, eating disorders and with the newest tools on the block, chatbots, we see people brought to suicide, essentially being nurtured bit by bit toward suicidal ideation and in some cases actually carrying out the act of suicide because an automated machine advised them this was a good idea.
The second category one might talk about is disinformation. There is polarisation, riots in the streets fomented online, radicalisation in particular of young men and the massive threat to democracy posed by the disinformation that flows online particularly at election times.
The other category we need to capture is scams. Scams are insidious. They are increasing and AI is turbocharging them. They come in the form of romance scams or networking scams where relationships are built and people are drifted towards crypto scams, where they are carved out of their entire wealth and that of those around them in a clinical and almost corporate way. The solutions we come up with need to address these harms. We need to make these products safe. If they are not safe, they should not be on the market in the first place.
I referenced addiction. It is a key part of the business model. The algorithms driving social media and informing what we see on our screens are designed right now - they were not always - - to keep our eyes on the screen and they are boosted by the AI technology that underpins them.
Age assurance and bans are one thing but they will not fix everything and there are major issues with them, which can be captured in a few different strands. They are privacy, where we are required to hand over official documentation, and rights, where they essentially block from online participation people who are expected to be cut off, and online is not all bad. They do not work as we have seen in Australia and France, for example, and they leave behind this cesspit of the internet that those of us who are not subject to the ban have to deal with. Therefore, while I welcome the announcements this week and while I hope fervently that the European Union has learned from how poor the ban in Australia has been, its inefficacy, and from the French experience where the courts have now challenged the mechanism of the ban, I have major concerns about how it will wash out, what the details will be and how it will be implemented. As far as I can see so far, those categories of harm will not be addressed by those bans.